A week or two ago, all of the Trump lovers were saying Thomas Sowell is a sellout and a has-been because he dared to question Trump. Now there are people saying Rush is dead to them because he said Rubio is conservative. Some people quote Glen Beck and Mark Levin and others trash them for it. And now we have a 110 post debate about Phyllis Schlafly and whether she supports Trump or not. Can we please get to the point where we can listen to the opinions of our conservative elders and feel free to agree or disagree with them without having to think they sold us out?
When I have conversations with people about politics, and they ask me who I’m for, I tell them, but follow up with, “but I will support any of them that can beat Hillary.”
This silly notion that unless someone is perfect in your eyes then you’ll just stay home and not vote is what got us Obama. Pull up your big boy pants and look at the big picture. NONE OF THEM ARE PERFECT. But any of them are a better choice for our future. The biggest question our next president will have is who to put on the Supreme Court. If we don’t have a Republican win, every 5-4 decision that went our way is GONE with one new liberal justice.
Best post I’ve read all morning..and over the past few days. I AM extremely p.o.’d. that National review put together an entire issue devoted to trashing a candidate on our side before a single vote had been cast. I want the best candidate and still haven’t made up my mind. I want someone who can win the general election. McCain and Romney were not it. Whoever gets into office will be nominating several Supremes. That is huge. And absolutely cannot let that decision fall to the Left.
And as weak as the Roberts court is - a left-majority court would be a horror show. We will all be living on a virtual left-run-amuck college campus. We would get codified thought-crime / hate-speech rules, mandatory diversity quotas in every aspect of life, monetary reparations, the end of any immigration enforcement, federal harassment of dissenting groups, and the full-throttle spread of Islamic rules for the workplace, schools, etc. All of Obama's temporary transgressions against liberty would become permanent and set in law.
OTOH, Rubio's immigration policies are exactly the same as Clinton's, despite some cosmetic lies. He would continue to replace Americans with huge population transfers from the third world into our homeland, guaranteeing the end of political conservatism in the USA, along with the end of anything particularly American about our homeland.
Rubio and Clinton both represent the end of our country. Rubio, however, would provide court picks that might delay some of the worst parts of the crash for another decade or so.