Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boosting Life Span By Clearing Out Cellular Clutter
kpbs ^ | 02/03/2016 | Nell Greenfieldboyce / NPR

Posted on 02/03/2016 5:50:58 PM PST by BenLurkin

Mice were much healthier and lived about 25 percent longer when scientists killed off a certain kind of cell that accumulates in the body with age.

What's more, the mice didn't seem to suffer any ill effects from losing their so-called senescent cells.

These are cells that have stopped dividing, though not necessarily because the cells themselves are old. "It's a normal cell that experienced an unusual amount of stress, and it decided to stop dividing," says Jan van Deursen, who studies senescent cells at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minn.

Older creatures have a lot more of these cells than young 'uns. And even though the cells aren't dividing, they do keep busy - they secrete a mixture of chemicals that can trigger inflammation, which seems to be involved in just about every major age-related disease.

So van Deursen and his colleagues wanted to know: What would happen if you simply got rid of senescent cells? That's tough to do in humans, but possible in mice.

The researchers created mice that were genetically altered so that giving them a drug would trigger senescent cells to kill themselves. Then they waited until the mice reached middle age, and gave some of them the drug.

At first, wiping out the senescent cells didn't seem to make much difference. But as the mice got older, the research team could see that the treated mice looked healthier.

"And then when we started to record the life span of the animals, we saw that there was about a 25 percent extension in life span of animals that had their senescent cells removed from 1 year of age on," says van Deursen.

What's more, the treated mice had fewer cataracts, hearts with better stress tolerance, and improved kidney function. And losing the cells didn't seem to cause them any problems, the researchers report Wednesday in the journal Nature.

The bottom line, says van Deursen, is that "it seems like we're accumulating a cell type that we really don't need for anything and that makes us more unhealthy and reduces the length of our healthy lives."

Needless to say, the hunt is already on for drugs that could eliminate these cells in people. That's not going to happen tomorrow, of course, and useful drugs might never materialize. But the findings in mice provide researchers with a new place to look.

Van Deursen himself is working with a new company, Unity Biotechnology in San Francisco, that has some promising candidates.

A scientist named Judith Campisi, who studies senescent cells at the independent Buck Institute for Research on Aging, also works with Unity. She thinks the findings of the latest study are significant. "The impressive thing is those mice not only lived longer but they lived healthier," says Campisi.

But she cautions that removing these cells isn't going to be a magic bullet against aging.

"Obviously, even in the Nature paper, those mice got old and died,""she points out.

And some research shows that these cells may have a useful role to play in our bodies. For example, there's evidence that senescent cells aid wound healing and that cellular senescence helps protect against cancer.

"One needs to move forward with care about trying to just kill off senescent cells with the anticipation that things will be wholly beneficial," says Dominic Withers, a researcher at the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London.

He says it looks like these cells do contribute to aging, but it's too soon to say what to do with them.

"I think it's early days at the moment," Withers says. "There's still quite a lot to learn about whether you would want to try and kill senescent cells or do something to the senescent cells that exist, such as stop them secreting this cocktail of potentially bad molecules."


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: aging; cancer

1 posted on 02/03/2016 5:50:58 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Scripps Research, Mayo Clinic Scientists Find New Class of Drugs that Dramatically Increases Healthy Lifespan (March 9, 2015)

The scientists were faced with the question, though, of how to identify and target senescent cells without damaging other cells.

The team suspected that senescent cells’ resistance to death by stress and damage could provide a clue. Indeed, using transcript analysis, the researchers found that, like cancer cells, senescent cells have increased expression of “pro-survival networks” that help them resist apoptosis or programmed cell death. This finding provided key criteria to search for potential drug candidates.

Using these criteria, the team homed in on two available compounds—the cancer drug dasatinib (sold under the trade name Sprycel®) and quercetin, a natural compound sold as a supplement that acts as an antihistamine and anti-inflammatory.

2 posted on 02/03/2016 5:56:09 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Bring it on, will give it a shot......


3 posted on 02/03/2016 6:08:08 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Cells that don’t divide have shorter teleomeres than new/newer cells.


4 posted on 02/03/2016 6:08:22 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Living forever

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x14ob1y_can-you-live-forever-2012_shortfilms


5 posted on 02/03/2016 6:10:08 PM PST by GraceG (The election doesn't pick the next president, it is an audition for "American Emperor"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I thought this was going to be another iPhone thread.


6 posted on 02/03/2016 6:10:27 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Magic bullet or not that’s a pretty interesting finding.


7 posted on 02/03/2016 6:12:26 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It should be noted that in ordinary fasting that lasts several days tends to kill off a lot of such cells, which are then regenerated by stem cells.

https://news.usc.edu/63669/fasting-triggers-stem-cell-regeneration-of-damaged-old-immune-system/

“...the June 5 (2014) issue of the Cell Stem Cell shows that cycles of prolonged fasting not only protect against immune system damage — a major side effect of chemotherapy — but also induce immune system regeneration, shifting stem cells from a dormant state to a state of self-renewal.”


8 posted on 02/03/2016 6:19:01 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sign me up. This getting old stuff isn’t fun.


9 posted on 02/03/2016 6:28:01 PM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I keep telling my wife that we need to clean the junk out of our house. I guess it works for cells too.


10 posted on 02/03/2016 6:28:54 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
It should be noted that in ordinary fasting that lasts several days tends to kill off a lot of such cells, which are then regenerated by stem cells.

Excellent post, thanks.

11 posted on 02/03/2016 6:57:57 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Better Stronger Faster.


12 posted on 02/03/2016 7:18:13 PM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Fascinating.


13 posted on 02/03/2016 7:59:57 PM PST by Cats Pajamas (When Hill and Bill trot out the rent-a-dogs and grandbaby in a stroller then you know she's sweating)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Thanks for posting that link. I was going to post that research indicated that periodic or intermittent fasting might achieve the same result, but I couldn't remember any sources. Thanks again.

Periodic fasting has a long history among humans, in fact it might have been the norm throughout most of human history.

14 posted on 02/03/2016 8:10:55 PM PST by Paradox (I'll vote for either one, I'm not an embarrassing bot like a few (?) others..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson