Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/30/2016 9:36:54 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Signalman

More entertainment for the masses. A pity nothing will come of it.


2 posted on 01/30/2016 9:39:56 AM PST by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Time for those in high places to show credibility and honor towards the USA and not PC Liberal Crap


3 posted on 01/30/2016 9:40:08 AM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

I am still curious who, if not HRC, is the target of the investigation?


4 posted on 01/30/2016 9:40:22 AM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

FBI pissed-offness can’t indict anyone.


5 posted on 01/30/2016 9:40:41 AM PST by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

The DOJ and FBI is getting ready to give Hillary the glaring of a lifetime. She had better be ready, they are dead serious this time. Maybe even a little fist shaking will be involved.


6 posted on 01/30/2016 9:41:45 AM PST by Glad2bnuts (Obama, leader of the Jayvee team.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

I have a feeling the WH is saying these things to get those who are investigating so agitated they quit and in the end, nothing will happen.


8 posted on 01/30/2016 9:42:52 AM PST by hsmomx3 (GO STEELERS!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Josh Earnest is as lame as they come in bambam’s administration.


10 posted on 01/30/2016 9:43:06 AM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Isn’t it time to arrest the Chief Magistrate for the High Crimes of Treachery and Surrender in the Face of The Enemy?


11 posted on 01/30/2016 9:43:09 AM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

I posted this on another thread about this same thing -

Until we see differently the FBI deserves the benefit of the doubt. If their desire was to cover this up why are they assigning more agents to the investigation and why did they open a second investigation into public corruption or “pay to play”?

Many people seem to be missing the obvious conclusion that you do not assign more investigators to an investigation that is going nowhere. The FBI is an agency who has historically and statutorily protected our nations secrets - it is one of their primary missions and they take it very seriously. I would be shocked if they do not recommend a long list of charges related to this investigation.

I am very interested in the second corruption investigation - that one seems far more complicated, but I would assume they have all the foundation emails and I am sure they have pulled many more emails off the state servers to see which ones correspond to donations at the Clinton foundation. That investigation would probably involve lots of Grand Jury activity (testimony/interviews and documents) and it would take far more time.

They would have to establish that “entity A” wanted something favorable from the State Dept and that favorable treatment corresponded to a donation to the Clinton foundation so you would likely have the left-hand (Clinton server) talking with “entity A” and at some point that would cross to the right-hand (State server) in the form of directives and favorable action. The go-between would obviously be Hillary’s inner circle. This would then be backed up by financial records of donations and likely subpoenaed emails within “entity A.” This investigation would be very complex and could take some time. The alleged assignment of many more agents is not indicative of an investigation going nowhere and public corruption is another primary mission of the FBI.

They won’t control charging, but I will be shocked if they don’t recommend charges for the classified material, that one seems to be obvious. The second investigation is far more complex. I don’t believe the politics will be within the FBI as so many seem to believe - it will be with those who actually charge or not charge (Attorney General). One has to think among the “pay to play” possibilities that there will be a few that are obvious. There has been speculation for years about favorable treatment from State matching donations to the Clinton foundation.

Just my personal speculation and thoughts.


14 posted on 01/30/2016 9:45:55 AM PST by volunbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Will he ask them to cover up all the mussie icons as he demanded Georgetown University to cover up Christian icons before he gave a speech there?


15 posted on 01/30/2016 9:46:48 AM PST by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Obama is the firewall here. Obama/Jarrett!


16 posted on 01/30/2016 9:50:43 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Next week they will be super-duper pissed off. *Yawn*


17 posted on 01/30/2016 9:50:47 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

doj and fbi report to the big kahuna. He’s not going to to let them arrest hillary. As I predicted. Nothing to see here.


22 posted on 01/30/2016 9:55:14 AM PST by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Killary and the Clintons—too big to jail. Of course, anyone else would be in jail already. They don’t comply with laws, why should we?


25 posted on 01/30/2016 9:57:19 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Wait.... aren’t we now supposed to hate Fox News?


27 posted on 01/30/2016 9:58:04 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

How about prosecuting/impeaching the following: Barack 0Bamma, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, Josh Earnest.... That’s a start.


28 posted on 01/30/2016 9:58:28 AM PST by Ranger Warrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

They are telling us how super pissed they are so we won’t revolt when they don’t do anything.


29 posted on 01/30/2016 10:00:08 AM PST by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is... - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman
A server in every pot.


30 posted on 01/30/2016 10:01:14 AM PST by Bobalu (I told you so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Unless they are pissed off enough to put their jobs on the line and tell the public the truth then it’s just more smoke being blown.


31 posted on 01/30/2016 10:01:19 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Off topic, but remember when that was one of Carlin’s 7 dirty words? I guess now it’s been replaced by “Redskins”.

I liked it better back then.


32 posted on 01/30/2016 10:02:28 AM PST by Forgotten Amendments (Nessie ... Sasquatch ... The Free Syrian Army ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson