Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/26/2016 9:01:35 PM PST by Windflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

Cruz all the way.


2 posted on 01/26/2016 9:04:43 PM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

The "Caucus Discussion" Thread(s) serve(s) as the pressure relief valve of much of FR. We are bigger than this, but the diminution of the Forum is because of the endangerment of the very enlightened notion of Divine Liberty.
5 posted on 01/26/2016 9:13:40 PM PST by SunLakesJeff (Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

The conservative treehouse had this pegged all the way back in July. They predicted the setup of a sexist attack by Kelley at the first debate. The promotion of Cruz to splinter votes from Trump was outlined as well as the various attacks the media would use to take down most candidates.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/07/30/nothing-unites-special-interests-like-a-common-enemy/


8 posted on 01/26/2016 9:24:05 PM PST by georgiarat (Obama, providing incompetence since Day One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier
Free Republic Caucus 2016 threads
Date Voting thread Discussion thread Results [on www.hotr.us] Sequence no.
1/27 [link] [link] [available later] 8
1/26 [link] [link] [link] 7
1/25 [link] [link] [link] 6
1/24 [link] [link] [link] 5
1/23 [link] [link] [link] 4
1/22 [link] [link] [link] 3
1/21 [link] [link] [link] 2
1/20 [link] [link] [link] 1

9 posted on 01/26/2016 9:27:53 PM PST by Lonely Bull ("When he is being rude or mean it drives people _away_ from his confession and _towards_ yours.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier; DoughtyOne

It’s good to see the Cruz supporters starting to come back, as indicated by the Cruz uptrend the last two days. Given some murmerings in that Consistent Conservative site of disgruntled Cruz supporters, I thought many of them would begin boycotting the FR Caucus, giving Trump some unrealistically outsized numbers here.


16 posted on 01/26/2016 11:16:45 PM PST by Vision Thing (If 2016 is The Walking Dead, then Trump is Rick Grimes, and Cruz is Deanna.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier
I must say I am troubled by Trump's war on Megyn Kelly. Maybe I am missing the bigger picture.
19 posted on 01/27/2016 3:08:56 AM PST by NonValueAdded (In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier; DoughtyOne

Thank you for doing these threads.


21 posted on 01/27/2016 5:30:50 AM PST by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I had a previous version of this deleted because of a formatting issue. Part of it was hard to read.

The Caucus thread should be seen no different than the place we go to cast our votes every election.

Inside that place we don't conduct conversations, debate the candidates or issues, campaign for our candidate, wear clothing that promotes a candidate, or pass out notes to those around us telling them who to vote for. We don't speak out loud. We simply vote. That's all we do. When we're done we don't wave our ballot and tell everyone that we voted for "X".

It's a voting thread folks.

Around 97% of the FReepers on the thread have the ability to grasp the concept. A few folks don't. Those few create the full percent of the vote that is invalid.

Here's how that plays out.

Entry 01: Name
Entry 02: Oops I voted wrong
Entry 03: Vote Name
Entry 04: Sorry I voted wrong
Entry 05: I won't do it again

Entry 01: I just have to make a text post to this thread.

Entry 01: I don't know if you know this, but you can't post anything other than votes to this thread.

Entry 01: Don't you folks know you can't do X on this thread?

Result, the invalid vote count mounts. Their candidate gets no support. FReepers wonder why the invalid vote count is so high, and tend to wonder if some shenanigans are going on, favoring one candidate. It serves to undermine confidence in the numbers. I don't mind the effort to conduct the poll, but it does bother me that folks contribute to undermining confidence in it.

If you want to thank me, do it by casting your vote in accordance with the rules.

Ideally, I'd like there to be no invalid votes. How does that happen? Folks follow the voting guidelines just like they do in the voting booth every election. You don't complain going in. You don't complain coming out. You just do it, no questions asked.

Others may see the folks who can't follow the rules and wonder why their candidate attracts people like that. This may factor into their thoughts about candidates.

Some people can't help saying something on the thread.

Others can't help responding to them. In some instances they are off on another thread and don't realize the person they are talking to addressed them from the vote thread. They respond innocently and post it to the vote thread without realizing it. Both people's vote are invalidated for the day.

When we walk into a voting station do we tell the staff how we are going to vote?

We walk into the voting station and follow the guidelines so that our vote is take, processed, and supports our candidate or cause.

We don't stand there and argue about it. We don't picket the place. We just follow through and support our person or issue.

So when I ask folks to just cast a ballot, I want them to just cast a ballot by the rules.

I don't want a person who is on fire for a candidate to call attention to their vote. That is electioneering. That wouldn't be allowed in a voting station we frequent. Why should it here?

Votes that won't count.

Vote Name!
VOTE NAME
Vote Name!!!!!
((Vote Name))

Why are these not allowed?

Once you start allowing anything that calls attention to a vote, other people are validated to do anything they want to call attention to their vote.

If a person can add "!", why can't a person add "!!!!!!"?

If a person can enter VOTE TRUMP, why can't they enter VOTE TRUMP

Folks, this isn't rocket science.

Vote Name

25 posted on 01/27/2016 11:16:52 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

Well, I screwed up. Put an exclamation point before I saw ‘no punctuation’.

Won’t make that mistake again.

Is that like a ‘hanging chad’? ;-)


28 posted on 01/27/2016 9:09:34 PM PST by Marie (TRUMP TRUTH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

Hey, how ya doing?

Thanks again for the thread.


32 posted on 01/27/2016 9:53:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

With so many members being booted off fr, I don’t consider the caucus to be valid so I have ceased to participate.


38 posted on 01/27/2016 11:07:30 PM PST by RedWhiteBlue (Mama tried)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson