You did not address me, but I will give my thoughts nonetheless. I like Kaplan's Mahler 2. Like Kaplan, I am kind of a nut about the piece and have a gazillion recordings of it. I held off listening to it for decades, because I did consider Kaplan something of a fake. I think the only reason I ever heard it was because I wanted an SACD version of the symphony, and bought his version with the Vienna Philharmonic mainly for its sonics. I ended up liking the performance a lot, and eventually bought his London Symphony version (his more famous version).
As critic David Hurwitz said, there is no reason to hung up on the fact that Kaplan was not a 'born' conductor. He took lessons to learn to conduct, and in that respect could be compared to Sir Thomas Beechum. He certainly brought a passion for the work, which is more than can be said of many who have conducted it. Kaplan is not my 'go-to' conductor for the work, but I do respect what he did.
Interesting.
![]() |
Thank you. :)
Of course, unlike Kaplan, Beecham conducted many complete works - not just one.
Thank you for intelligent, thoughtful observations.