Posted on 12/02/2015 9:33:43 PM PST by RC one
The goal is to keep guns away from people convicted of violating laws protecting the entrances of health care clinics.
Senate Democrats plan to force a vote on keeping guns out of the hands of people convicted of violating laws protecting the entrances of health care clinics.
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid has introduced the amendment, which would ban gun ownership by people who have been convicted of misdemeanors under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, a 1994 law meant to prevent violence and harassment at abortion clinics.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Snap!
Obviously he misspoke.
He meant to say "Exercise machine control !"
Harry. You really need to go get a real job boy. You can’t be a government freeloader all of your life. Besides. America could really use a break from your commie bull****. How ‘bout we name your “amendment” the Nazi Gun Grabber Act.
always.
BBC America was even worse about the preaching.
On their 6 PM news Wednesday evening on the East Coast, the voice of the limey male reporter started off the broadcast by saying, “Another day, another mass shooting in America.”
FU, BBC.
that was the time that the parked car kicked his ass. when the giant rubber band kicked his ass, it was the other eye.
I think his wife gets drunk and beats him.
No no no, we wouldn’t violate their civil rights. We can only violate the civil rights of Republican leaning Americans.
I’d like to buy her a drink if that’s the case.
Harry Reid blocked Kate’s Law and now he is forcing a vote on another law, all as Minority Leader. He did the same type of thing as Majority Leader. So what, exactly, is the difference?
It seems to me he is still running the Senate.
Can anyone explain this to me?
FYHR! F’g traitor to the USA and our Constitution....
the British press is usually much less biased than the American press. The BBC is obviously an exception, but there are several british newspaper websites that I would read for their coverage of the obamites before most american sources.
I see what you did there...
“Reid is expected to force a vote on the amendment during consideration of the Republican’s Obamacare repeal bill, which would use the complex budget reconciliation process to eliminate major parts of the health law.”
If it is an amendment to this bill, wouldn’t it get vetoed as well?
FUHR
Because that worked so well in Paris.
Yes, I heard the Daily Mail is one of the good English-based web sites.
It’s been awhile since I’ve visited their web site; I need to go there more often.
“I’d like to buy her a drink if that’s the case.”
LOL
Reid is a criminal.
Wasn’t it just a week or 2 ago that the House passed something by a veto-proof margin which dingy Harry immediately declared blocked in the Senate and we have heard NOTHING about it since?
And now dingy is FORCING a vote on this other issue.
Now WHO is the MINORITY leader and WHO is the MAJORITY leader?
How about a vote to stop islamic immigration
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.