Some people scare too easily and should naturally stay away from "scary" places and things ...
To: DogByte6RER
Whoever was this asshats lawyer should lose their license for filing this obviously frivolous lawsuit
2 posted on
11/26/2015 12:41:36 PM PST by
clamper1797
(If stupidity hurt ... liberalism would be agonizing)
To: DogByte6RER
What a Baby! the website warns you:”If you run, our people WILL CHASE YOU down like the chicken(sHts) you are”
I like that GIF. That rooster sure taught the little boy a lesson he won’t soon forget.
To: DogByte6RER
What if he visited the White House?
5 posted on
11/26/2015 12:51:05 PM PST by
OttawaFreeper
("You'd see a different game if nobody wore a helmet". NY Rangers' Barry Beck 1983)
To: DogByte6RER
I have to side with the guy. Clearly, Haunted Houses should be equipped with Safe Spaces. And no one should be allowed to scare you without your consent.
Eeeeeek Means Eeeeek!!
To: DogByte6RER
There no ghosts, so he has no case.
9 posted on
11/26/2015 12:55:57 PM PST by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
To: DogByte6RER
almost as big a baby as this years crop of college snowflakes
10 posted on
11/26/2015 12:57:18 PM PST by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
To: DogByte6RER
The next thing he should hear is “Here’s the bill”
14 posted on
11/26/2015 1:08:52 PM PST by
bigbob
To: DogByte6RER
The event is better than not bad.
16 posted on
11/26/2015 1:10:47 PM PST by
stevem
To: DogByte6RER
In business law, there is a concept called “unconscionable”, in which the situation is so inherently unfair and unjust, that a judge can set aside a “letter of the law” ruling in favor of an equitable and fair one.
A similar concept needs to be created in our civil law.
It would address individuals who are litigious, lawyers who engage in barratry, “litigation for the purpose of harassment or profit”, and such cases that the judge rules do not rise to the level of a civil lawsuit.
For example, someone buys a cup of hot coffee, then spills it on their own lap. A case by the injured party against the coffee seller is frivolous, and cannot to any extent be blamed on them, so should be dismissed outright.
In this case, a man went to a “haunted house” amusement area, whose very purpose is to cause harmless, artificial scares. He paid money, and he got what he paid for. That is it. From the very start the judge should have dismissed the case, with prejudice.
18 posted on
11/26/2015 1:14:12 PM PST by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: DogByte6RER
Balboa Park is crawling with queers. Sounds like he might be one.
25 posted on
11/26/2015 1:23:15 PM PST by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: All
Wait till some guy from Syria named Mohammed turns and lunges at you with a disarmed but real chainsaw AFTER you exit a public "Haunted House"...or maybe he has a "scary" scimitar, or even a "scary" real pitchfork.
Or maybe it happens to your 10 year-old kid.
Yuk, yuk, yuk....
Leni
29 posted on
11/26/2015 1:34:08 PM PST by
MinuteGal
("I will stand with the Muslims if the political winds shift in an ugly direction" - Barack ObaMao)
To: DogByte6RER
The guy should be glad they didn’t re-create the chainsaw scene from ‘Scarface’. (NOT going to post the URL, too gory)
31 posted on
11/26/2015 1:39:56 PM PST by
mkjessup
(Islam is the ENEMY of all civilized people.)
To: DogByte6RER
That is a rooster chasing that kid. A rooster can cut ya!
33 posted on
11/26/2015 1:41:36 PM PST by
Ditter
(God Bless Texas!)
To: DogByte6RER
the headline makes perfect sense
but
reading the article, I disagree with the court
there is a difference between what a reasonable person would expect to experience in a regular ‘haunted house’ (Casper the friendly ghost saying BOO, maybe a skeleton making creaking noises, or??)
AND
what happened to this guy .... (a scary employee chasing him with a gas-powered chain saw!?????!! Since when is assault with a chain saw part of normal Halloween haunted house amusements?
51 posted on
11/26/2015 2:51:00 PM PST by
faithhopecharity
(Brilliant, funny, and incisive Tagline coming to this space soon.....)
To: DogByte6RER; Slings and Arrows; martin_fierro
52 posted on
11/26/2015 3:07:31 PM PST by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: DogByte6RER; MeshugeMikey; Slings and Arrows
A state appeals court has given precedent-setting status to a ruling that gave the scary mansions the same legal status as ski lodges, bumper cars and other commercial recreational facilities: They're not responsible for injuries caused by an "inherent risk" of the activity. There should be required insurance policy coverage for such risks.
61 posted on
11/27/2015 1:37:47 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(The goal of Socialism is Communism. Marx and Lenin were in agreement on this.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson