No one’s better at setting the table than Fiorina. She describes exactly whats wrong with Washington.
But outside her zero based budgeting proposal - which is common sense - she rarely offers any solutions.
Besides that, she has a record of saying one thing on the stump and leading in a completely different direction.
Carly reminds me of a couple of women bosses I worked under. I suppose there is some added pressure for these women to prove themselves, but they end up sounding shrill and condescending. Carly is like that. In an effort to prove herself worthy of the presidency, she has become aggressive rather than assertive. This attitude just would not serve her well as president.
Fiorina is a smart cookie and quick on her feet...but she does come across as a “hawk”, what with her “no fly zone” and how she would treat Russia. Maybe we’ve conceded the middle east to Russia/China through lack of interest by this administration, but it is the fault of Obummer, either on purpose or deliberately. I don’t fancy a war against Russia with Obummer at the helm, or at all.
I wouldn’t vote for Fiorina for dog catcher. Even though she has some natural aspects that would make her better at it than most.....