[Swordmaker]

Nothing other than your bloviating has proved that your devices are anything better than trailing technology (faster, even if true, <> better functionality). They are just assertions. There is not a single significant meaningful iPhone function that has not already been previously deployed on Android (and for many of them, multiple versions).

It is obvious you did not bother to read the reviews at Anandtech or other tech sites or bother to pay attention to the comparison tests of the bench marks. . . or you'd know my evidence is NOT just my unsupported "assertions" as you claim but actual fact. You, on the other hand, don't have any evidence on which to back your bloviating or your posturing.

[freedumb2003]

>>It is obvious you did not bother to read the reviews at Anandtech or other tech sites or bother to pay attention to the comparison tests of the bench marks<<

You don’t know the difference between benchmarks and functionality. Even your own references just gauge speed. Great, it is a little faster until the next gen of the next phone. I note it does not evaluate the Galaxy 6+ series.

You seem to be deaf. The FUNCTIONS of the iPhone are one offs of the Android applications.

Lagging technology. A little faster but a little less useful than the Android systems. Then the next gen of Android will be faster than the Apple — and so on and so on.

But the usefulness of the iPhones just mimics the already deployed usefulness of Android-based phones.

Speed tests? That is all you have?

I note you AGAIN ignore my thesis — that only apple fanboys line up at midnight to overpay for lagging technology since it is a religion to you. NEW!! APPLE!!!

Adults who have phones from other sources just wait and order them with no fanfare. It is what grownups do.

The OPs thesis is intact — Apple Stores are temples for the brainwashed fanboys.