I'd hit it.
Posted on 09/16/2015 2:45:26 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat
Sex with robots will be ‘the norm’ in 50 years, say experts. Men are considering the prospect with curiosity and a sense of humour. But academics and feminists are terrified and calling for them to be banned. Let me tell you why.
Who, or what, men have sex with is the basis of our civilisation. It is the driving force behind our greatest accomplishments. Men don’t compete for abstract pleasure: they compete to bag the best mate. The internet, the pyramids and the moon landings would not exist were it not for man’s desire to have sex with woman.
That’s why Nature experiments more widely with men: the male IQ range is wider, and there is more variation in male behaviour and biology than in women. Men are where experimentation happens, because a wider variety of male aptitudes and preferences will keep women happier and result in a more well-rounded and healthy society.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Isn’t the headline a bit heterosexist?
They should panic. I don’t have to say “wait, you’re still here?” every morning..
I'd hit it.
Why doesn’t the same logic apply to gay marriage?
I think this will be the must-have for college men; the bots won’t expect commitment or dinner or cuddling.
Like I said: I’d really rather have a robot maid. One that could make small talk would be great.
Sorry, already called dibs
Why would women be worried?
After all it is obviously easier to make a MaleBot than the more complex FemaleBot. As a result it will be the male robots that enter the marketplace first.
And, as proof, I offer the fact that simple hand held prototype MaleBots are readily available from Amazon. Shipped in 2 days if you have Amazon Prime.
Sooooo,, how much do those in the photo cost again? Even 5 or 10k would be far less than a divorce.
Or change their mind and accuse you of rape later.
Like Thors hammer. Has Laz weighed in on this?
“Why doesn’t the same logic apply to gay marriage?”
Because liberals can’t exploit robots for votes since they lack irrational emotion ... well, at least robots don’t have it *yet* ...
Yeah that too.
An "OFF" switch?
Then women should be worried.
it won’t go fat on you
it won’t complain if you do
it won’t get ‘headaches’
it won’t threaten to divorce you
it won’t go out on you
it won’t spend your money
it won’t nag you
it won’t demand you buy it expansive gifts
and it has an off button for its voice box
Paradise!
:)
> They should panic. I don’t have to say “wait, you’re still here?” every morning..
Pretty funny. I actually got to that point with my ex-fiancée ;-)
I agree largely with his indictment of the pseudo-feminist culture and the repulsiveness of today's marriageable women. The few who don't have more tattoos than Popeye and more metal in their faces than a shrapnel victim are totally incompetent as mates, since they bring little or nothing to the table except neuroses. They can't cook, they can't keep house, they don't want kids (and I wouldn't trust them with a child anyway), they don't know when to shut up, and they spend other peoples' money like it was confetti.
Take away sex and they're useless for anything but decoration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.