Posted on 09/14/2015 7:43:28 AM PDT by C19fan
A painted lady says she no longer feels safe posing topless in Times Square after she punched in the face and called a 'nasty wh**e'. Amanda Roman, 23, was attacked by a woman in front of the huge crowds gathered at the New York City landmark. Roman, one of a group of bare-breasted women who have caused controversy in recent weeks, says she 'doesn't feel protected' by police officers stationed in the square.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
“There is no explaining anything like ‘age-appropriate’ to people like you. I hope you end up in jail.”
I’m perfectly aware of “age appropriate”.
WHY then is it perfectly legal to show children images/books that glorify gratuitous violence and greed?
These ideas are implanted in their head and you can see the results. Violence and greed are tearing the world apart.
I mean showing nude consenting adults to a child. Either images or in person.
Showing nudity or natural lovemaking is a felony.
Yet showing violence and greed to children are completely allowed. In images, books and live shows.
No, just sleazy and immoral. I guess it's not wrong for a woman to advance herself using her body instead of her mind as far as she is concerned. The heads of the leaders of the feminazi movement must be exploding. And to the young women - you better cash in on those attributes before the fall of your..................
Wow
I was sorta sympathetic till that final sentence
I’ve usually gone into sex talk with my five around 3-4th grade
More in depth later with the boys I puberty
My girls actually asked me much later for help kind of to find their way
Honesty and an emphasis on the needs of the partner and of course discretion and waiting as long as possible....especially for girls
But letting children see porn under say late teens is verboten for good reasons
If you had said don’t make children feel shame about nudity I’d understand
Shyness over nudity comes natural on its own
It’s like bathing in the jacuzzi tub with mom or dad
You just know when it’s time to quit between gender different parent and child
I’d say 4-6 maybe.....6 being way out there....it’s like breastfeeding a four year old...a sure fire way to create a faggot
Japanese are a lot different about this...odd for a reserved peoples
It’s one thing for a kid to run across it on their own, which is bad but I understand it happens. It’s a whole other thing if an adult is purposefully showing pictures to kids.
I’m not naive.
I completely agree with you on that.
“It’s one thing for a kid to run across it on their own, which is bad but I understand it happens. It’s a whole other thing if an adult is purposefully showing pictures to kids.
I’m not naive.”
The thing is, the ONLY way they can currently see nudity and sex is through pornography. A great deal of which is violent and not representative of healthy sex.
If you try to balance the violent porn they see by showing natural lovemaking, you are considered a sex offender. Even if it is your own child.
Sure people will say “you can explain making love to them without images”. Sorry, but seeing endless amounts of violent porn and the false pleasure it portrays will be more of an impact to your child than any of your words.
It looks like they are making plenty of money just posing for photos.
They were going to be leaving very soon anyhow. NYC winters are not kind to the underdressed.
Old Hippy Much?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.