Mainly Breitbart and Foxnews?
Posted on 09/09/2015 5:23:09 AM PDT by bluescape
This must have been commented on but it's tough to do a through Hillary search here.
Mainly Breitbart and Foxnews that I go to a lot have so many goofy photos of Hillary that they must be on purpose. Which is fine with me. I just think its funny if true. And very coincidental if not.
I'd say almost 100 per cent of Breitbart Hillary photos are slightly to extremely silly. They could have a full time position for sorting for unflattering shots, which again I fully support. Only slightly makes up for years of press passes she's received from other news sources.
To be fair to any news outlet goofy Hillary pics might be tough to work around.
OK Freepers... Don’t we WANT HilLIARy to be their nominee???
I mean Trump will mop the floor with her- it will be more than 60/40 I bet
They’re no more coincidental when the MSM posts pictures of Republicans with stupid looking expressions on their faces. It’s the game of optics.
I would suppose they do use photos meant to undermine the dark queen. Is that any different from the MSM doing the opposite for decades with their picks?
It’s just their way of saying they have gotten their marching orders. They are preparing the way now for Bernie or Joe. Obama has apparently made his decision - the MSM is just following orders.
Obviously. Leftists think what their puppetmasters tell them to think. They do what their puppetmasters tell them to do. The puppetmasters have decided to destroy Hillary. The Leftist puppets follow their masters.
Try to get a good image? Same odds as winning the lottery twice.
I like most of them as they are portraying her as the hag she is
There could be some subtle mind control at work here:
Perhaps "silly" photos are being used as a way to make her appear more "human".
My guess is that since you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, that's all they have to work with.
Absolutely. The decision on a photo is an editorial one just as the “slant” of a story. Do you remember the photos of the obam with halos over his head? Not an accident.
No, she just looks like that.
Mainly Breitbart and Foxnews?
And your point is????
Any media outlet looks for pictures that are unflattering if that is their view point. They look for flattering pics if that is their view point (think of all the angelic back lit photos of the DiC)
I seem to have noticed more pictures of The Hildebeast in orange jumpsuits. I think it is a great color for her. The only thing missing from her outfit is a large stenciled D.O.C. (dept. of corrections) across the back! Coming soon!!
My local liberal rag uses only goofy pictures of Hillary.
I believe those are the only ones available of her.
No big point. I half expected someone else to notice it or know about a deliberate posting of awful photos from outlets she had a beef with. But now that could be almost any outlet. Not just conservatives.
I agree with folks that think liberal outlets may be piling on figuring she’s gone past the tipping point of baggage.
It’s no exceptional prediction but I don’t think she’ll be the nominee. I think even a Clinton with a backward bending MSM can’t overcome the corruption that is now evident while running for President.
I remember when she was competing against Obama in 2008 election and ‘someone’ produced nutcrackers in the form of Hillary.
It was a huge seller.
She looks bad from the back. Unstable. Hey, have you even seen the back of BO’s head? It looks like a hard little coconut.
Hillary Nutcrackers still available on Amazon.com
$22.00 and ships in two days. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.