Posted on 08/18/2015 11:51:22 AM PDT by conservativejoy
The Constitution does not give homosexuals any right to pseudo “marriage” any more than it gives a right to “privacy” and therefore abortion..
Oh, he’s suddenly going to undo 3 generations, 50 years of divorce? Because sodomite pseudomarriage is only the drop of the other shoe.
Thing is I don’t mind gays hooking up. That’s their business. But to call it marriage, not so much. I’m perfectly content when they do a civil union. Trouble is, the legal paperwork says Marriage License. That I have a problem with.
Yes Ted Cruz has the talent and ability to educate the public on what options are available.
Mark Levin and the principles at the COS Project also propose an amendment to the Constitution to allow 3/5’s of states to void, repeal, quash any supreme court ruling.
I heard the same thing about ObamaCare being overturned with a Republican majority in Congress. Color me skeptical.
I hope so, but I fear it’ll take God’s wrath being poured out on us undiluted, with mass death and destruction, before there’s any hope of turning back to Him. People are just too disgusting and too depraved.
But what will they do with the White House Rainbow lights?
A federal judge will strike down any such amendment as unconstitutional, just like they did with Florida’s amendment against gay marriage.
“But what will they do with the White House Rainbow lights?”
I have a suggestion. :)
...heard the same thing about ObamaCare being overturned with a Republican majority in Congress. Color me skeptical...
Lying, two faced politicians account for the rise of Trump.
So let's stick to a plan of President Trump. Senator Cruz with his legal knowledge can work that end of things in the US Senate, helping to write laws that won't be overturned.
Just another promise for republicans to break.
Better to elect Trump and let Trump deal with the economy. While Cruz stays in the Senate and passes the legislation.
Why doesn’t someone submit a bill for “Holy Matrimony?” It protects the church, let’s gays do whatever the heck they want to do without forcing their lifestyle on those who have faith.
Basically the marriage bill that Clinton signed could just have the title changed and resubmitted.
If Congress knocks the federal courts out of the review process on this matter, they won’t have any jurisdiction to strike down anything.
I hope it can be undone. Because as long as this depravity remains in place, the whole country can just go burn in hell for all I care.
I'm not holding my breath, but then again, God is still on His throne, answering prayers and directing affairs.
I'll be damned if I will.
Over the weekend Trump told "Meet the Press" that he "has always hated the concept of abortion."
Yet he once told Howard Stern that if someone asks him, he says he's pro-life "with some exceptions", but it's never been his big issue.
Stern also asked him about his opposition to homo marriage, Trump replied that he wasn't saying he might not change.
He's a lying liberal who is telling conservatives what they want to hear, but he has no core principles or morality.
Cruz is the man.
The Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the Constitution’s silence on issues like marriage mean that such issues are automatically and uniquely up to the individual states to decide.
But as a consequence of parents not making sure that their children are being taught the Constitution as the Founding States had intended for it to be understood, 10th Amendment-protected state powers versus the constitutionally unenumerated right to gay “marriage” in this case, pro-gay activist justices got away with legislating the anti-Christian, so-called “right” to gay “marriage” from the bench.
What a one man, one marriage amendment to the Constitution would do is to require all states to recognize only one man, one woman marriages.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.