Definitely a one sided article. I would really like to know the other side of the story.
Agree. The exoneration was not really a finding of innocence or based on scientific proof, such as DNA. I was based on technical errors in the trial proceedings. That may mean she did not get a fair trial, but it does not mean she didn’t do the crime.
They probably the thought the son confessed to spare his mother. That kind of thing happens, usually parents for children though.