Agree. The exoneration was not really a finding of innocence or based on scientific proof, such as DNA. I was based on technical errors in the trial proceedings. That may mean she did not get a fair trial, but it does not mean she didn’t do the crime.
Let’s see.
The son confessed to a court-ordered psychiatrist, had gun residue on his hands, and led police to the murder weapon.
And this wasn’t introduced at trial.
Sounds like a lot more than just ‘technical errors’.