To: nickcarraway
No mention of the former CEO of Firefox. Funny....
2 posted on
07/21/2015 6:54:24 PM PDT by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: nickcarraway
When it’s our private lives that are smeared across the internet, we might finally ask ourselves: why did I plaster all my private information across the internet on Facebook ?
3 posted on
07/21/2015 6:55:19 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: nickcarraway
No mention that the Conde Nast executive was Timmy Geithner’s brother.
To: nickcarraway
Who the feck IS this chick?
Um...cheating on your spouse while PAYING for a website to HELP YOU DO SO is HARDLY ‘screwing up.’
It is a conscious CHOICE that YOU made when you PAID to JOIN this wretched hive of scum and villainy.
5 posted on
07/21/2015 6:58:05 PM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: nickcarraway
Anybody remember all of this angst over people’s privacy when Sarah Palin was getting her email account hacked?
To: nickcarraway
I would still find it interesting exactly whose records and data were compromised - and what their transgressions against Obama were.
This is simply too convenient. I hear ghe Ellen Romesch Stratagem rearing its head again.
8 posted on
07/21/2015 7:10:19 PM PDT by
Old Sarge
(Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
To: nickcarraway
“Gawker editors took to social media to represent the piece as a stand against infidelity...”
Nonsense. If they were really upset about the infidelity, they would have quietly informed the wife about what they had learned. They would have spared her the ordeal of reading about it in the headlines and having her whole life up-ended, since her life is entwined with her spouse, even if he is unfaithful. Instead, they decided to publicly shame him just to get web traffic, showing no regard at all for his wife or their marriage.
To: nickcarraway
In the old days of newspapers John’s were outed.
To: nickcarraway
Keep in mind, the parties in question aren't tracking down pedophiles or murderers or those who commit hate crimes. Of course not. That would be islamophobic.
To: nickcarraway
My guess is that Heather is one of the sluts on AM.
L
17 posted on
07/21/2015 8:02:38 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: nickcarraway
to leak the identities of 37 million users unless the site is shut down immediately. 37 million cheaters? America's destruction of marriage and the family started long before the LGBT movement. They are just the latest disease to infect the dying body.
18 posted on
07/21/2015 8:02:42 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: nickcarraway
Blackmail. Somebody created a cash cow of compromising info, and somebody else recognized it for what is was. It’s not about wrecking lives, it’s about extracting money from marks.
In my humble opinion.
19 posted on
07/21/2015 8:16:26 PM PDT by
dangerdoc
((this space for rent))
To: nickcarraway
Vows are to God not to your spouse. Let God judge the actions not man.
22 posted on
07/21/2015 9:23:12 PM PDT by
keving
(We get the government we vote for)
To: nickcarraway
Destroying someone’s life.......someone with whom you may have a political disagreement......is just sport for Leftists, and has been since the Clinton era (remember the Scorched Earth Policy?). Our society/culture has hit rockbottom. Time to look UP and LIFT UP!
23 posted on
07/21/2015 9:25:30 PM PDT by
originalbuckeye
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: nickcarraway
The author feigns outrage against outing of personal information ☆only☆ because a homosexual was outed (Timothy Geitner's brother), and we can't have that.
24 posted on
07/21/2015 11:10:33 PM PDT by
Reddy
(B.O. stinks)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson