Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Broken Marriage Vows Grounds for Blowing Up Someone’s Life?
New York Magazine ^ | 7/20 | Heather Havrilesky

Posted on 07/21/2015 6:51:43 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Do you miss the good old days of tarring and feathering, town-square stockades, and public guillotining as entertainment? If so, you may be savoring this week's events, which reveal that the crime of betraying one's marriage vows is now prosecutable by journalists and hackers alike, punishable by public shaming online. Last week, Gawker publicly outed a Condé Nast executive, a married father of three, for allegedly soliciting a male escort. The story was later removed from the website by Gawker executives, but the damage had been done: The executive, many argued, was not a public figure, yet his private life is now public knowledge. Adding insult to injury, some Gawker editors took to social media to represent the piece as a stand against infidelity, thereby becoming the least likely defenders of the sanctity of marriage ever known.

Then, yesterday, hackers compromised cheater/dating site Ashley Madison and threatened to leak the identities of 37 million users unless the site is shut down immediately. The hackers claim to be alerting the public to the fact that the site's $19 "full delete" option, which purports to allow customers to permanently delete their records, doesn't actually do what it claims. So the hacker group is courageously defending online privacy by ... violating other people's online privacy. If Ashley Madison and the date-a-wealthy-dude site Established Men aren't permanently shut down, the hackers claim that they'll publish customer records, allegedly including nude photos and private sexual fantasies. The hackers wrote, "Too bad for those men, they're cheating dirt-bags and deserve no such discretion."

Which is to say: So-called cheating dirt-bags don't deserve to be protected from public shame granted by the entire globe, likely affecting their ability to find future employment, secure custody of their kids, and have any kind of peace of mind about love, friendships, and family relationships moving forward, but they do deserve a "permanent delete" option that actually works.

Let's back up for a minute and consider this new world, in which personal values might be policed by a gaggle of reporters, hackers, and onlookers. Keep in mind, the parties in question aren't tracking down pedophiles or murderers or those who commit hate crimes. They are seeking out and shaming regular human beings who had the audacity to seek sex outside of marriage.

Before you dredge up the image of every no-good cheater you've ever known, consider the many fallible individuals in the world who fall in love, get married, have children, and then find themselves questioning their sexuality, questioning their gender identity, or (less provocatively) simply questioning their lifelong choice of sexual partner. Maybe a spouse simply has a weak moment and makes a mistake. Sometimes people marry the wrong person. Sometimes people cheat and regret it immediately. Do we really want to indiscriminately drag every last one of these people into the middle of town and set their lives on fire for them?

As easy as it is to chuckle at a bunch of douchebag dudes getting outed for cheating, consider for a minute the full scope of ramifications endemic to our new, easily hacked lives. Every last one of us is hopelessly vulnerable to hacking today, thanks to insecure smartphones; insecure databases; absurd, ever-changing, and increasingly invasive Terms of Service; and supposedly benevolent megacorporations that illegally suck private data off unsecured Wi-Fi systems and legally compile private information gleaned from multiple apps to sell it to data brokers like Experian who might, in turn, haplessly sell it to Vietnamese identity-theft crime rings. If that sounds like some kind of Orwellian paranoid fantasy, it may be time to wake up and smell your credit-card numbers hitting the Dark Web.

But who knows? Maybe your smartphone and your computer are both encrypted and you change your 15-character passwords regularly. Maybe you don't happen to trust Google or Facebook or any email program and you don't use apps and you're essentially a Luddite who gives every sophisticated modern appliance the side-eye. Maybe you don't have and will never buy an appliance with a built-in recorder or camera, maybe you live far from people who own drones, maybe you never visit outdoor malls or any space that's videotaped 24/7, maybe you have no credit cards and have never applied for a government job and have no social security number. Maybe you've never strayed from your marriage, said the wrong thing about a co-worker, made an off-color joke in an email, taken a nude photo, aired an embarrassing secret in an anonymous online forum, paired up with a partner others might consider inappropriate, or made any other manner of very private fumble or mistake (or engaged in any behavior that others might see as a mistake) over the course of your lifetime. But if any of the above is true for you — and unless you're living in a shotgun shack in Outer Mongolia, I'm going to guess it is — then you're vulnerable.

This might be a good day for us to rethink our attitudes about the victims of hacking, whether it's Sony's Amy Pascal or the married dude next door, because the mob is coming for us, too. Do we really want to live in a world where no one is allowed to make mistakes? Are we arrogant enough to believe that we'll never screw up? If we do screw up eventually, do we want our future personal failings to be judged and prosecuted by a self-righteous mob who may or may not share our values and ideas about right and wrong?

When it's our private lives that are smeared across the internet, we might finally ask ourselves: Is this the revolution we were looking for?


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Hobbies; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 07/21/2015 6:51:43 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No mention of the former CEO of Firefox. Funny....


2 posted on 07/21/2015 6:54:24 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

When it’s our private lives that are smeared across the internet, we might finally ask ourselves: why did I plaster all my private information across the internet on Facebook ?


3 posted on 07/21/2015 6:55:19 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No mention that the Conde Nast executive was Timmy Geithner’s brother.


4 posted on 07/21/2015 6:57:08 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Who the feck IS this chick?

Um...cheating on your spouse while PAYING for a website to HELP YOU DO SO is HARDLY ‘screwing up.’

It is a conscious CHOICE that YOU made when you PAID to JOIN this wretched hive of scum and villainy.


5 posted on 07/21/2015 6:58:05 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

I didn’t know that...thanks for the info. Is he a tax evader like his brother?


6 posted on 07/21/2015 7:00:36 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Anybody remember all of this angst over people’s privacy when Sarah Palin was getting her email account hacked?


7 posted on 07/21/2015 7:06:54 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I would still find it interesting exactly whose records and data were compromised - and what their transgressions against Obama were.

This is simply too convenient. I hear ghe Ellen Romesch Stratagem rearing its head again.


8 posted on 07/21/2015 7:10:19 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I was thinking the same thing.

This hardly ranks as a “weak moment” or a one off sudden impulsive behavior.

This is premeditated and thought out. I have no sympathy for any of these people.


9 posted on 07/21/2015 7:18:20 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Gawker editors took to social media to represent the piece as a stand against infidelity...”

Nonsense. If they were really upset about the infidelity, they would have quietly informed the wife about what they had learned. They would have spared her the ordeal of reading about it in the headlines and having her whole life up-ended, since her life is entwined with her spouse, even if he is unfaithful. Instead, they decided to publicly shame him just to get web traffic, showing no regard at all for his wife or their marriage.


10 posted on 07/21/2015 7:19:01 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
Thank you.

Ashley Madison's employees make money by helping people hurt other people.

They and their customers are asking for turnabout, which is fair play.

Good Episode IV reference.

11 posted on 07/21/2015 7:24:38 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
I'd guess....many are tax evader's.

I evade paying taxes all the time....

Bet you do too!

12 posted on 07/21/2015 7:27:42 PM PDT by Osage Orange (What this country needs are more unemployed politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In the old days of newspapers John’s were outed.


13 posted on 07/21/2015 7:39:40 PM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Keep in mind, the parties in question aren't tracking down pedophiles or murderers or those who commit hate crimes.

Of course not. That would be islamophobic.

14 posted on 07/21/2015 7:42:01 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
"Bet you do too!"

Can't. I'm retired. Get a pension and social security. Divorced. I don't own a house or property, don't have any dependents anymore, don't have any savings, stocks, bonds, or certificates of deposit. No loans, or credit cards. Nothing to claim except myself.

15 posted on 07/21/2015 7:43:16 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Yeah....I don’t own anything, myself.


16 posted on 07/21/2015 7:59:54 PM PDT by Osage Orange (What this country needs are more unemployed politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

My guess is that Heather is one of the sluts on AM.

L


17 posted on 07/21/2015 8:02:38 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
to leak the identities of 37 million users unless the site is shut down immediately.

37 million cheaters? America's destruction of marriage and the family started long before the LGBT movement. They are just the latest disease to infect the dying body.

18 posted on 07/21/2015 8:02:42 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Blackmail. Somebody created a cash cow of compromising info, and somebody else recognized it for what is was. It’s not about wrecking lives, it’s about extracting money from marks.

In my humble opinion.


19 posted on 07/21/2015 8:16:26 PM PDT by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
No. No I do not remember any angst at all from the authors “we” group members:
ie:

“If we do screw up eventually, do we want our future personal failings to be judged and prosecuted by a self-righteous mob who may or may not share our values and ideas about right and wrong?
When it's our private lives that are smeared across the internet, we might finally ask ourselves: Is this the revolution we were looking for?”

I have to laugh at her juvenile hypocritical idiocy!
The “public” who will now most assuredly judge her, will probably not celebrate her values and her ideas, so “they” are by default, self-righteous!

I'd bet she had no issue with any of the destructive dirty tricks/attacks against other people, or any of the various illegal political and criminal persecutions “her group” has conducted for the last decade or more against “my group”.

After all, she wasn't self-righteous...
ROTFLMAO! Karma is the perfect, beautiful gift that God grants those who obey his command to leave vengeance to Him.

20 posted on 07/21/2015 8:40:59 PM PDT by sarasmom ( I did not spend the most productive years of my life to make it easy for idiots to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson