Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does ‘decimate’ really mean ‘obliterate'’? (answer: no)
oxfordwords.blog ^ | 7/9/15 | Shea

Posted on 07/09/2015 11:40:57 AM PDT by pabianice

Most people have a linguistic pet peeve or two, a useful complaint about language that they can sound off about to show other people that they know how to wield the English language. Most of these peeves tend to be rather irrational, a quality which should in no way diminish the enjoyment of the complainer. A classic example of this is the word decimate.

The complaint about the word typically centers on the fact that decimate is used improperly to refer to ‘destroying a large portion of something’, when the ‘true’ meaning of the word is ‘to put to death (or punish) one of every ten’.

There are several problems with this complaint. The first, and most obvious, is that language has an ineluctable desire to change, and there are almost no words in English which have been around for more than a few hundred years without taking on new meanings, changing their old ones, or coming to simultaneously mean one thing and the opposite (a type of word known as a contronym).


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: pabianice

No. It means to kill one out of every ten.


21 posted on 07/09/2015 12:04:05 PM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

How do you like “I could care less” when the speaker means he couldn’t care less?


22 posted on 07/09/2015 12:04:07 PM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Please ensure that you insure your vehicle beforehand.


23 posted on 07/09/2015 12:04:21 PM PDT by antidisestablishment (The last days of America will not resemble Rome, but Carthage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

...percent.


24 posted on 07/09/2015 12:04:28 PM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

Too bad (for them). I reject their fakery.


25 posted on 07/09/2015 12:04:44 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Overwhelming usage has changed the meaning of the word decimate, therefor I cannot see how you can claim the word is “misused.”

Why don’t we look at the REALLY irritating change of ordinary words such as “Gay.” I weep for the deliberate destruction of a litany of lovely words which have been “misused” to the extreme. “Our Hearts Were Young and Gay” is a far cry from the new meaning of the word; unnatural.


26 posted on 07/09/2015 12:05:07 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidisestablishment

Homo-nyms are now more popular then ever. After all, they have the same rights as hetero-nyms!


27 posted on 07/09/2015 12:05:47 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I have to disagree. Language is constantly in flux, and the only legitimate measure of a word’s “proper” meaning is whether that meaning is universally understood or not.

Once it has achieved a level where the vast majority of English speakers will understand the usage easily, then it is proper usage. Language is defined by the people who speak it, not by the academics who document how it is spoken in dictionaries and grammar texts.


28 posted on 07/09/2015 12:05:55 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
No. It means to kill one out of every ten.

So even if the dictionary accepts it (destroy a large portion), and it does, you still won't?

29 posted on 07/09/2015 12:06:06 PM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

...or even, ‘more unique’.


30 posted on 07/09/2015 12:07:08 PM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: econjack

My pet peeve: improper use of “that” instead of “who”. Example:

He was the man that robbed the store.

It should be:

He was the man who robbed the store.

I hear this one butchered fairly regularly on the evening news.

I TOTALLY agree. It is one of my pet peeves as well.


31 posted on 07/09/2015 12:07:27 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Would you rather we stick with using a not well understood word, even if it means an increased number of preventable fires and accidents?


32 posted on 07/09/2015 12:07:46 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Which ain’t a lot.....................


33 posted on 07/09/2015 12:09:02 PM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It was a punishment meted out to Roman troops where one out of every ten men in a unit, say ten men out of a Century (or 400 out of forty centuries, or a full Legion), was selected at random and executed. For mutiny, disobeying orders, cowardice, etc. The French army in WWI followed a similar policy against units that refused orders to leave their trenches in suicidal attacks against German barbed wire and machine guns. It reduced the unit’s strength by ten percent, but presumably the remaining ninety percent would have gotten the message. Now it has no specific meaning except for some kind of horrendous slaughter.


34 posted on 07/09/2015 12:09:24 PM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
“apocalypse” to mean calamity or catastrophe, when the word actually means disclosure.

"Disclosure Now"?


35 posted on 07/09/2015 12:09:28 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

My pet peeve is the word ‘only’ placed in the wrong place in a sentence...................


36 posted on 07/09/2015 12:10:20 PM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

For my own usage, no.

But that does not mean I do not know what those who continue to misuse the word are saying (including on-line dictionaries).


37 posted on 07/09/2015 12:11:22 PM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1
I hear this one butchered fairly regularly on the evening news.

Lots of robberies in your area?...................

38 posted on 07/09/2015 12:12:01 PM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Irregardless.....


39 posted on 07/09/2015 12:12:10 PM PDT by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

The beheadings will continue until morale improves!.................


40 posted on 07/09/2015 12:12:45 PM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson