Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Time Will Stop For a Leap Second
National Geographic ^ | June 26, 2015 UTC | Jane J. Lee

Posted on 06/28/2015 11:19:44 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets

Just as leap years keep our calendars lined up with Earth's revolution around the sun, leap seconds adjust for Earth's rotation. This kind of fine-tuning wasn't much of an issue before the invention of atomic clocks, whose ticks are defined by the cycling of atoms. Cesium-based clocks, one kind of atomic clock, measure the passage of time much more precisely than those based on the rotation of our planet, so adding a leap second allows astronomical time to catch up to atomic time.

Most of us won't notice the addition, which happens at 23:59:59 coordinated universal time (UTC), or 7:59 p.m. ET, unless we deal in timescales shorter than a second, or if we use a computer program that crashes because it can't handle the leap second. It's happened before: The 2012 leap second brought down Reddit, Gawker Media, and Mozilla.

Picture of clocks The reflection of clocks and lights streak a window in Prague in the Czech Republic. PHOTOGRAPH BY ABRAHAM NOWITZ, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC CREATIVE "It's a major interruption mostly because there are a lot of systems that aren't prepared to handle the leap second correctly," says Judah Levine, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado. Leap seconds occur irregularly, which makes it hard for programmers to test their fixes, he explains.

Adding Time Leap seconds don't come on a regular schedule because Earth's rotation varies, says Demetrios Matsakis, chief scientist for time services with the United States Naval Observatory in Washington D.C. Our planet is slowing down, but it does so in unpredictable ways. So some periods require more leap seconds than others.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Science
KEYWORDS: atomictime; cesium; leapsecond; stringtheory
So researchers added ten seconds all at once in 1972 to the world's astronomical clocks, [Johnston,]explains. Inaccurately. Actually, UTC was set approximately equal to UT2 (a smoothed version of UT1) in 1958, and continuous adjustments had been made to civil time to keep it close to UT1 (time determined by earth's rotation) all along. Leaps, or discontinuities in civil time were made in multiples of 50 nanoseconds and the rate of UTC was slowed down by multiples of 15 parts per billion, to keep step with UT1. In 1972, the decision was made to bite the bullet, and allow UTC to "beat" atomic seconds, adding or removing a leap second as needed to stay with 0.9 seconds of UT1.
1 posted on 06/28/2015 11:19:44 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
The 2012 leap second brought down Reddit, Gawker Media, and Mozilla.

I won't cry if it does it again. Maybe this time Gawker will stay down.

2 posted on 06/28/2015 11:23:22 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
Thanks Lonesome in Massachussets.

· String Theory Ping List ·
Periodic Table of Rejected Elements
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


3 posted on 06/28/2015 12:58:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

So do we set our clocks backward or forward? /snort


4 posted on 06/28/2015 1:20:13 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama

Your clock will be one second fast as of 8 PM EDT in June 30th. So you would set it back. And those corporate slave masters will get one second of extra uncompensated labor out of the exploited masses on second shift. Watch for widespread demonstrations.


5 posted on 06/28/2015 1:29:46 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (I love it when we're Cruz'in together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

I just want too see my Watch say 7:59:60.


6 posted on 06/28/2015 2:39:00 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Watch for widespread demonstrations.

After this week, things are speeding to a head. This will drive the masses over the edge.

7 posted on 06/28/2015 2:55:43 PM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama

Back one second at June 30, 2015 23:59:60 (sic)


8 posted on 06/28/2015 3:00:23 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Men need a reason to shop. Women need a place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
time.is promises to display 7:59:60 June 30th Eastern Time.
9 posted on 06/28/2015 4:12:18 PM PDT by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

June 30th. You are a bit premature.


10 posted on 06/28/2015 4:17:22 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (I love it when we're Cruz'in together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Not one mention of Global Warming in any of that. I can’t believe it.


11 posted on 06/28/2015 6:56:37 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Global warming is not completely absent. Current theory (and admittedly it is a weakly verified theory) holds that the current secular deceleration of the length of day caused by tidal friction should be more rapid, but is partially offset by the continued melting of the polar ice caps since the last ice age.


12 posted on 06/29/2015 2:51:15 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Men need a reason to shop. Women need a place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Can’t we just speed the earth up by a second?


13 posted on 06/29/2015 2:55:25 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

The slowing of the earth is caused by tidal friction with the moon. Currently, the rate of loss of rotational kinetic energy is about one gigawatt. To maintain our current speed, which loses a second every 18 months would require a gigawatt on average, until, literally, the end of time. To speed up enough so that we would stop losing time, would require an additional one time investment of 200 gigawatt-years, spread over as long a period as desirable.

The mechanism for delivering the extra momentum is not clear to me. Perhaps vast arrays of west facing mirrors which would reflect solar radiation only in the westerly direction. Solar radiation pressure is about 9 micronewtons per meter-squared at the surface of the earth. I leave it to you to figure out how large an array of mirrors would be required.

Alternately, we could just adjust our watches every 18 months or so.


14 posted on 06/29/2015 4:02:15 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Men need a reason to shop. Women need a place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
It won't. We're ready for it this time. There is an easy fix that can be put in place before June 30th. It involves setting up the Linux OS to restart the NTP daemon in slew mode 25-39 hours before the Leap Second occurrence.
Some time after the Leap Second occurs the NTP daemon is restarted in default mode.
15 posted on 06/29/2015 11:14:11 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Good afternoon. I hope you are doing well.

Fwiw, I am not participating in this manipulation of time. I will remain one second behind.

5.56mm

16 posted on 06/29/2015 11:24:47 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

You’re too late. UTC is already 35 seconds behind atomic time. Why would you prefer arbitrary atomic time, over more natural solar time. If we had invented atomic time in 136 BC, you’d be about two hours behind solar time by now.


17 posted on 06/29/2015 5:45:08 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Men need a reason to shop. Women need a place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson