Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb documentary[REAL TRUTH]
Military Channel ^ | Nov 29, 2014 | Military Channel

Posted on 06/08/2015 2:17:41 PM PDT by StormPrepper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: StormPrepper
The heavy water was for their test reactor. Heisenberg didn't think there would ever be graphite pure enough to build a reactor using graphite and natural uranium. He knew heavy water would work, so he went down that path. Fermi proved him wrong by getting the purity of graphite to the point where criticality using natural uranium could be attained. Various commando raids (some successful, others disastrous) were launched to interdict the heavy water shipments from Norway to Germany.
21 posted on 06/08/2015 3:12:52 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner
The top German scientists purposely led the atomic program to heavy water knowing it would be unfruitful.

While it has been suggested that Werner Heisenberg was foot dragging or even possibly deliberately sabotaging their research, I don't think going in the direction of a heavy water reactor is an example of this.

That contraption would have worked. It would have worked as well as Femi's graphite reactor anyway.

More importantly it would have given them good research answers that they would need to either breed Plutonium, or build Isotope separators.

The big secret at the time was that chain reaction fission was even possible.

22 posted on 06/08/2015 3:16:26 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

Fat Man was dropped on Nagasaki and that was a plutonium implosion device of the same design as that tested at Trinity. Little Boy was the first one used in combat, a gun-type device using highly enriched uranium. It had not been tested prior to its use other than some criticality tests and gun tests using non-nuclear material. There never was a full-scale test of the Little Boy design. It was tested in combat.


23 posted on 06/08/2015 3:17:22 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

No ... Little Boy was detonated over Hiroshima. And yes, it was very much UNtested. OTOH, the uranium gun design is pretty darn foolproof (as nukes go)

Fat Man was detonated over Nagasaki, and was somewhat similar to the Trinity device. Both were plutonium implosion devices. The implosion design is a bit more difficult, as the entire chemical explosive jacket must detonate simultaneously all the way around the plutonium pit.


24 posted on 06/08/2015 3:19:04 PM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: StormPrepper

It may have been reported, but Japan was nowhere close to making a bomb. Germany was somewhat closer, but abandoned the program in 1942, when Hitler decided to throw all his resources at the USSR. However, our intelligence still thought a German bomb (but never a Japanese bomb) was a likelihood and had assassination teams out as late as 1944 to kill Werner Heisenberg.


25 posted on 06/08/2015 3:19:15 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StormPrepper

26 posted on 06/08/2015 3:20:40 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
100% correct. This is why Truman went ahead with the second bomb so soon after the Hiroshima bomb. We only had six in production at the time (two were dropped). But the technology was such we didn't KNOW if they would all work---that was a major argument against doing a "demonstration" bomb. If we demonstrated a dud, that would steel the Japanese resolve even more. After those six---if they all worked---it was going to be 1946 before we had more.

And while I believe it was the bomb that forced the Japanese surrender, they were also pressured by the fact that the USSR was entering the war.

27 posted on 06/08/2015 3:21:47 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
It took General Grove to turn the US into a giant bomb making factory that produced two weapons. One a fission bomb and the other a fusion bomb. Plus the one used at Trinity.

They were both fission bombs. One was a Uranium gun bomb ( A Uranium projectile fired down an actual cannon barrel into a Uranium receptacle.) The other was an Implosion plutonium device. A much more complex weapon. Trinity was a plutonium implosion bomb too. They never tested the Uranium gun bomb, they just knew it would work, but the implosion device was a lot tougher to guarantee because of it's complexity. That's why they did the Trinity test.

Fusion bombs did not come about till Teller Ulam. (~1952)

28 posted on 06/08/2015 3:22:35 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

That is not what the biographer of Werner Heisenberg says. Rather, he says they just didn’t know, and that Heisenberg didn’t begin to have the resources he needed to test the heavy water anyway.


29 posted on 06/08/2015 3:22:49 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Agree. Rhodes is a good scholar. There’s a pretty new bio of Heisenberg out too, called “Heisenberg’s War” that confirms what you said.


30 posted on 06/08/2015 3:23:44 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Read the book: The Making Of The Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes.

Excellent book. Highly recommended.

Amen. I plugged it myself. The sequel is almost as good.

31 posted on 06/08/2015 3:24:12 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Little Boy was the last one we used, so it was an untested design until we dropped it on Nagasaki.

That design was tested at trinity. It was the plutonium implosion design.

32 posted on 06/08/2015 3:25:04 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I agree it is an excellent book.

The deep background in nuclear physics, back into the 19th century, gives immense insight into why things played out the way they did.

And of course, we had to spend massive amounts of money just to get two bombs. Neither Japan nor Germany had the money or resources to do that.


33 posted on 06/08/2015 3:25:05 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

I disagree that Hirohito “doubted” that a bomb destroyed Hiroshima. Dr. Nishina was sent by train immediately to report back and he said it was an atomic bomb. But it wasn’t Hirohito who needed to be convinced. It was the warlords. They weren’t convinced after two bombs, when he overruled them.


34 posted on 06/08/2015 3:25:13 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LS

I can’t remember the book I read on it. It mentioned the “reacter” that we did find. It was a joke. And even it did work there was no understanding of the radaiation safty aspects. They would have been dead if it did work. I don’t think they were that stupid by accident.


35 posted on 06/08/2015 3:35:06 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
There has never really been a true fusion bomb. The thermonuclear weapon that Teller, Ulam, Oppenheimer, et al referred to as "The Super" was[/is] really an enhanced fission bomb. Nearly all of the energy comes from fission. The fusion part of the bomb is ignited by fission, and its purpose is to create an enriched cross section for a second fission, which is where the fantastic yield comes from.
36 posted on 06/08/2015 3:42:14 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner; LS
Actually Heisenberg never had any chance of producing a nuclear weapon. His theoretical understanding of the neutron cross section led him to believe he could produce the thermonuclear weapon that was eventually produced in the 1950's [initially dubbed the "H-Bomb."] Heisenberg did not have the infrastructure, the engineering expertise, nor the resources to get beyond the theoretical stage. Most of his remarks after the war were self-serving. He was trying to create an "Atomic Bomb." But he didn't know how, and couldn't have succeeded if he did.
37 posted on 06/08/2015 3:45:05 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
Exactly. Neils Bor, the Danish physicist said "you'll have to turn the whole country into a factory" At the end of the war he basically said "You did"

In the book the atom bomb (as they called it then) was meant for Germany. But since Germany collapsed so fast the powers that be opted then for Japan. Groves said that if we hadn't produced anything after spending all that money and resources they would wind up in jail.

Since you've read the book, I'm just posting this for those that hadn't and maybe would like to buy it. I'm not sure if the local library has it. My dad bought it way back in th 80's when it first came out. It's been read so many times in our family the covers are about to fall off.

The resource listings in the back of the book leads to other great books on the subject. It seems that the anti-bomb detractors hadn't bothered to read or research anything. They just throw out bogus information.

38 posted on 06/08/2015 3:47:10 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Allegedly the Japanese atomic program was operating out of an area in what is now North Korea, to hide it from the B-29 raids.

There’s a book, Japan’s Secret War by Robert Wilcox that goes into the evidence. Wilcox is a believer, I’m not, but his work is interesting. Particularly his documentation of how the Red Army made a beeline to that location after the USSR’s entry into the war, where they dismantled whatever was there and hauled it back to Western Russia. Just like they did with all those German factories.


39 posted on 06/08/2015 3:50:57 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Don’t forget the thin man.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_Man_(nuclear_bomb)


40 posted on 06/08/2015 3:51:03 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson