Posted on 05/07/2015 5:36:44 AM PDT by BJ1
For an army of women, Mr Right is simply not there, no matter how hard they look for him. And the reason? When it comes to marriage, men are on strike.
Why? Because the rewards are far less than they used to be, while the cost and dangers it presents are far greater.
Ultimately, men know theres a good chance theyll lose their friends, their respect, their space, their sex life, their money and if it all goes wrong their family, says Dr Helen Smith, author of Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood And The American Dream.
They dont want to enter into a legal contract with someone who could effectively take half their savings, pension and property when the honeymoon period is over.
Men arent wimping out by staying unmarried or being commitment phobes. Theyre being smart.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Operative word: their
The title has 5 superfluous words at the end.
Men married women more when they kept their legs crossed more.
It’s a sad state when the over-riding concern is what happens when the marriage is over, not “till death do us part.”
It’s sadder yet for virtuous young people, especially young ladies when the pool of eligible mates refuse to man up.
The non-virtuous ones made their bed already and are paying the price in many ways. Unfortunately, they’ve messed it up for everyone.
Who wants to marry a man hating feminist?
Pray America is waking
If I’d have shot my ex wife when I first wanted to, I’d have been out by now.
Well, let’s see now.. marry someone who will cheat behind your back, who then upon divorcing you gets at least half your stuff, most of your monetary assets, and if you’re a military retiree, part of your retirement.
Yeah... what a concept!
It is difficult to fall in love with someone who can look you in the eye and say in so many words that it is her “choice” whether the baby you helped create should live or die.
Women indeed are the “gatekeepers” of civilized society.
When men have to channel their sex drive into maintaining a relationship and supporting someone else besides themselves,
we have civilization.
When they are allowed to not have that restriction on their copulation,
there is chaos.
Women’s indecision, contradictions and unreasonable demands have been codified into law and/or made part of societal norms.
But men are survivors. They are Upper Paleolithic Hunter-Gatherers whose instincts have not been completely dulled by modernity and technology. Scorn us and we will withdraw. Accuse us without evidence of a transgression and we will ignore you. Criticize us while ignoring your own voluminous faults and we will chortle and get on with our own business while gladly ignoring yours.
Heterosexual women who believe, endorse and amplify ‘feminism,’ a purely leftist ideology created from whole cloth by lesbians and old maids, are fools of the highest order as they have sabotaged their own romantic prospects.
Men are blamed for everything under the sun, why live under the same roof with it.
Who wants to marry a Cro-Magnon jerk?
Why men won’t marry you
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3287153/posts
This may have something to do with it.
Or saved ourselves from being saddled with immature, uncaring mama's boys.
Have you seen the depicted role models for young women in today’s popular culture?
Operative principle, female dominance otherwise known as intermittent submission.
Kindly explain in detail how feminism achieved this goal.
IMO, no-fault divorce laws are largely to blame. As it stands now a woman could run off and sleep with the entire New York Jets football squad, and her betrayed hubby would still have to pay her support.
If the law still held each party accountable for their decisions things would be much better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.