"But now, the suspect is under arrest again for repeating the same crime that got him locked up."
The way this reads, this bad guy gets out of prison, goes back to the same place, kills the same 15 year old boy he killed before, and is not arrested for doing the exact crime again.
Why, oh why, cannot they write: "But now, the suspect is under arrest again for committing a similar crime in a similar way that got him locked up before?" but as it is, the writer leaves it totally unclear whether the crime that locked him up was the murder, a domestic assault, or some gang related crime. . . another domestic violence case? WHAT? This is one of the most poorly written news stories I have seen in a long time. It leaves one completely at a loss as to what he did this time to get him sent up. . . SHEESH!
Did they let a high school intern write this article?
So maybe the question should be just truncated to: Why, oh why cannot they write?
“What I can’t see is how they can put their table right there where they dug Steven up and sit there every day,” said the teen’s grandmother, Dorothy Essman, who lives just down the block from the Rosas house.///
Because they’re worthless animals. But that’s just mho.