Skip to comments.
Fox News Inches Closer To Death As Its Median Audience Dropped In 2014 [laugh of the day]
Politicus USA  Real Liberal Politics ^
 | 4-29-15
 | Jason Easley
Posted on 04/30/2015 1:11:08 PM PDT by smokingfrog
As Fox Newss audience continues to age, the conservative network inches close to death as in 2014 its median audience dropped to 1.1 million. > Pew Research State of the Media Report quoted < 
-but- 
Fox News is still racking up big profits due to the high carriage fees that they charge providers. Fox News earns $1.50 per subscriber. This is the third highest carriage fee of any network. Fox News trails on ESPN and TNT in the amount charged per subscriber. Any liberal or progressive that has cable or satellite is paying Fox News $18 a year per household. High fees paid by people who disagree with Fox News, and never watch it, are one of the reasons why the network can be highly profitable as viewership declines.
(Excerpt) Read more at politicususa.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: alsharpton; cablenews; foxnews; foxnewsratings; jasoneasley; msnbc; realliberalpolitics; tuckercarlson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next  last
    
To: smokingfrog
    Any liberal or progressive that has cable or satellite is paying Fox News $18 a year per household.
Ha ha.
 
2
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:13:15 PM PDT
by 
Leep
(To put it in laymen's terms liberal/progressive ist coo coo.)
 
To: smokingfrog
    Wow. Talk about delusional. I don’t care for Fox News but this dude is slightly off here in his analysis.
 
3
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:13:53 PM PDT
by 
ilgipper
 
To: smokingfrog
    The writer’s conclusion makes absolutely no sense given the facts he cited.
 
4
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:14:31 PM PDT
by 
skeeter
 
To: smokingfrog
    That is really funny. Lets compare CNN and MSLSD numbers?
Its nice out too. More people are outside.
LOL
 
5
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:15:17 PM PDT
by 
Uversabound
(Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
 
To: skeeter
    The writer’s delight also makes no sense given that Fox News has much higher ratings than all of the liberal alternatives, which are all losing viewers even faster.
 
6
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:15:53 PM PDT
by 
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
 
To: smokingfrog
    The best part is the comment from a reader (below the article) who states that MSNBC is too conservative. Oh boy...LOL
 
To: ilgipper
    Could start to see a slow drain. I Never thought i would stop watching from 8 to 11, but Bill's self righteousness, Kelly's insulting remarks to Huckabee(who i'm not een a fan of but were so over the top for no reason) and Hannity’s antics and constant yelling made it unwatchable.
8
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:18:37 PM PDT
by 
dp0622
(Franky Five Angels: "Look, let's get 'em all -- let's get 'em all now, while we got the muscle.")
 
To: Leep
    Well I am paying the carriage fees for CNN, MSNBC, Bloomberg and AlJazeera America. So it kind of evens out.
 
To: smokingfrog
    The writer is trying to make it sound like Fox News is low-rated or something. lol
 
10
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:20:27 PM PDT
by 
GeronL
(Clearly Cruz 2016)
 
To: smokingfrog
    They never stop trying to make themselves feel better about their failure.
 
To: smokingfrog
    "Fox News remained relatively steady, losing only 1% of its viewership with 1.7 million watching nightly. But CNN (down 9% to 495,000 viewers) and MSNBC (down 8% to 568,000) struggled."
 
 Yet the headline emphasizes the decline of Fox, despite its relative stability compared to its competitors. Jason Easley shows himself as a partisan hack, and yet another faux journalist.
To: Buckeye McFrog
    Well I am paying the carriage fees for CNN, MSNBC, Bloomberg and AlJazeera America. So it kind of evens out.  Not really — Fox news isn't really all that kind to conservatives, like the Republican party they just phrase things so they'll be accepted by us w/o really doing anything. 
 [/cynic]
 
13
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:26:33 PM PDT
by 
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here?   A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
 
To: smokingfrog
    I haven’t watched the broadcast news since 2000, but I seldom watch Fox News these days either. The bloom is off the rose, Fox News haven’t been a conservative broadcaster for a long time, if they really ever one.
 
To: smokingfrog
    There is nothing conservative about FoxNews. Everyone there hates the Tea Party, too.
 FoxNews just does not hate America - although it is drifting that way.
15
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:26:52 PM PDT
by 
donna
(I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth. - Barack Hussein Obama)
 
To: smokingfrog
16
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:27:20 PM PDT
by 
MEG33
(God Bless America And Our Troops)
 
To: donna
    A lot of Saudi money goes into Faux News.
 
17
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:27:41 PM PDT
by 
dfwgator
 
To: smokingfrog
    Mmmm, I don’t really like Fox News much. it’s too liberal for me, especially Shemp Smith ;/
But I don’t see Fox going anywhere.
 
18
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:29:06 PM PDT
by 
chris37
(Heartless)
 
To: centurion316
    Fair and Balanced.......
 
What's wrong with that ?
19
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:30:37 PM PDT
by 
Churchillspirit
(9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012: NEVER FORGET.)
 
To: smokingfrog
    I’m not clicking on the link and giving them a hit but this from what I have written is yet another sign of desperation.
 
20
posted on 
04/30/2015 1:31:14 PM PDT
by 
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson