Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police tactic? Baltimore sued over injuries from rough rides
Fox News ^ | 4/28/2015 | Fox News staff

Posted on 04/29/2015 5:30:04 AM PDT by Usagi_yo

Video at link -- it the link to shep smith reporting works.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Society; Travel
KEYWORDS: baltimore; freddiegray
Two lawsuits, recent from 2012 from two separate people during two separate incidences. One of which suffered a "dislocated spine" after a 'Baltimore Ride' was given by the cops who didn't restrain the individuals.
1 posted on 04/29/2015 5:30:04 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo
There is an attitude that extra judicial punishment is ok. That attitude extends to FR.

It's not up to the cops to apply punishment. It's up to the courts. If they don't do it as you like, change it, don't dump it.

Extra-Judicial punishment is always wrong.

People that advocate it are not espousing conservative values. Conservatives are supposed to believe in the rule of law.

/johnny

2 posted on 04/29/2015 5:36:00 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

It used to be called “The nickel ride.” It is a Baltimore and Philly method of “curbside justice” given to perps the when the police believe they need a little extra convincing. Freddie was arrested over 20 times, so it’s safe to assume the police knew him well.

Old cop joke: “How many police does it take to throw a handcuffed prisoner down the stairs at the jail?”

Answer: “None. They always jump.”


3 posted on 04/29/2015 5:47:01 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

It’s another more sinister sense of entitlement that cops have grown accustomed too.

I certainly don’t advocate extra judicial punishment.

I only advocate a non-judicial military type of punishment that can be meted out to misguided cops from somewhere outside the general chain of authority and supersede a “self investigation” report.


4 posted on 04/29/2015 5:47:49 AM PDT by Usagi_yo (Give me liberty or give me a cash settlement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Yea, but don’t they beat you senseless first in Philly?


5 posted on 04/29/2015 5:50:24 AM PDT by Usagi_yo (Give me liberty or give me a cash settlement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

I don’t know about Philly. The “nickel ride” was a way to give a deniable beating, no witnesses.


6 posted on 04/29/2015 5:54:17 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Extra-Judicial punishment is always wrong.

I agree, and in these incidents, where a passenger was not buckled in is simply WRONG!

I believe that most people on FR are against THESE types of actions; however, we are not against cops using whatever force is needed to get criminals off the streets, i.e., if a criminal resists arrest - there is a good chance that he is going to get roughed up, if a criminal runs - there is a good chance that he is going to get roughed up, if a criminal pulls a weapon or attempts to take the cops weapon - they should be SHOT, etc...

The primary problem is that many people equate the latter items with the former items and those are NOT the same and are NOT related (typically). But in our society today, cops are supposed to handle a 27 year old murder suspect with kindergarten gloves, and if the cops didn't treat him like a 5 year old child, then this murder and all of his other crimes should just be ignored, forgotten, and forgiven.
7 posted on 04/29/2015 5:56:01 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ExTxMarine
As long as the police follow the law as written, and do not 'add' any punishment on their own, I'm fine with police following laws.

If I don't like it, I can try to get the law changed.

But it has to be written laws that they follow, not unwritten, just because he ran rules that cops made up.

I believe that there are laws on the books about running from police. Enforce those.

/johnny

8 posted on 04/29/2015 6:09:19 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I think we agree with one another.

The problem is, just like so many liberal idiots are spouting today (including the one in the White House), this is a systemic problem across America. This is using one incident, which was completely legal and correct (Michael Brown shooting) and comparing it to something that was completely ILLEGAL and WRONG (extra-judicial punishment (if that is what happened)). And then saying, “We understand why they are doing this.”

That is horse-hockey.


9 posted on 04/29/2015 6:36:07 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ExTxMarine

I have transported literally thousands of prisoners in my time. Sunday was the first time I ever buckled one up. In order to buckle a prisoner you have to reach across the person. The subject I had was small framed, contrite and sober so I felt it was safe. He asked to be buckled. I will transport another couple dozen tomorrow (another job) and will not buckle any of those up. Officer assaults will increase dramatically if a requirement to buckle all prisoners goes into affect. I should add that MOST police vehicles do not have seatbelts in the back seat. For years Michigan State Police did not have security cages in their cars and they transported in the front seat, buckled. So it is not a new concept, just one that isn’t done on a regular basis. Transport vans would be deadly. This would require an officer to enter the transport area to secure the prisoner. I cannot think of a more unsafe action for an officer.


10 posted on 04/29/2015 6:57:59 AM PDT by midcop402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: midcop402

I understand; however, in the Freddie Gray case, it is my understanding that it is Baltimore Police Department (BPD) policy to buckle their prisoners in the back seat.

I agree, that there are times when buckling a prisoner in would be worse than not (i.e., confrontational prisoner, bleeding prisoner, etc...). I have never been a police officer. I was a chaser for a few months in the Marine Corps, and did apprehend, arrest, and transport prisoners to the brig.

My reference was only to the fore mentioned BPD policy.


11 posted on 04/29/2015 7:04:06 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Sounds like there’s a Floyd Ferris wannabe in the highest levels of the Baltimore PD.


12 posted on 04/29/2015 7:13:11 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Extra judicial punishment has been in place for a vary long time. In the early 1900s, many police agencies engaged in the "third degree", severely beating suspects in order to extract confessions. These incidents received widespread publicity in the 1930s, and the practice was curtailed. Water boarding was extensively used as well as a tool to get suspect to confess; the Bush, Jr., administration did not invent this practice. It was extensively used during the Philippine Insurrection, far more intensely and less restrictively than in the Iraqi and Afghan wars. These tactics were brought home to police agencies.

As long as there are criminals, police, and lenient judges, these practices will continue.

13 posted on 04/29/2015 7:14:59 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
Just because it has been done for a long time doesn't justify it or make it legal.

It's up to citizens to put a stop to extra-judicial punishments.

It's not up to us to justify it.

/johnny

14 posted on 04/29/2015 7:22:05 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

If Pittsburgh cops did this, you’d be dead (potholes).


15 posted on 04/29/2015 7:57:13 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

No, as long as some jobs attract low quality individuals that management doesn’t supervise properly, then corruption, theft, bribery, and abuse of prisoners will take place.


16 posted on 04/29/2015 10:05:51 AM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: midcop402

Simple problems are not unsolvable, the “nickel ride” has probably been an activity of thuggish cops for a hundred years.

In 2015 we don’t want to hear that it is impossible to not send arrestees to the hospital when driving them to the station, we just want it ended.

Surely enough generations of time have passed that we can work out the problem of driving someone 5 miles without abusing them.


17 posted on 04/29/2015 10:10:20 AM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson