Skip to comments.
Federal crime statistics are a rebuttal to the race-grievance industry lies.
variouis federal government agencies
| April 17, 2015
| WilliamofCarmichael
Posted on 04/17/2015 9:20:29 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael
The U.S. Department of Justice administers two statistical programs to measure the magnitude, nature, and impact of crime in the nation: the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
-- FBIThe federal crime statistics in a table below are a rebuttal to
- the race-grievance industry,
- Obama-Holder demagogues, and
- MSM employees
lies that crime is almost entirely white police, white neighborhood watch, and whites in general violence against Black Americans.
The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) have long made it publicly known -- if only the lies weren't so profitable -- that
- more whites die as a result of police actions (arrests) than any other race (cols 12.1 and 12.2)..
- yes whites outnumber blacks by at least six-to-one; and
- if that's a critical factor so it is vis-a-vis the crime numbers that
- show blacks committing crimes in numbers way more than should be expected;
- blacks murder at least twice as many whites as whites murder blacks, year after year (cols 1.2 and 1.4); and
- there's the violent crimes (murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault) of youths under 18..
- in recent years whites are in second place in terms of violent crimes against persons (columns 3.1 and 3.2); and
- there's the (IMO) curious facts of
- a large number of fewer white offenders than white victims of violence and
- a large number of more black offenders than black victims of violence (cols 4.3 and 4.4).
And don't forget.. unless stated otherwise Hispanic gang bangers (white and black) are included as white and black.
The race-grievance industry, Obama-Holder demagogues, and MSM employees obviously profit from lies.. truth tellers are not outliers!
It's the race-grievance industry, Obama-Holder demagogues, and MSM employees who are the out-and-out liars.
I will appreciate any corrections but I will not debate NCVS Table 42 data. I am aware of the controversy raised and I have included extra links to address it.
(There are a lot of vacant buckets.. if you know where there's federal government data for those buckets I'll see if I can add the data to the table.)
Earlier posts: Table of federal government economic data covering past several decades and Obama. here
TOPICS: Reference
KEYWORDS: crime; crimesbyrace; crimestatistics; lies; racecrime; racecrimestatistics; racegrievance; racestatistics; statistics; ucr; williamofcarmichael
The U.S. Department of Justice administers two statistical programs to measure the magnitude, nature, and impact of crime in the nation: the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
--
FBIArrests Data COLS 1 TO 4.
- 1. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR)
HOMICIDES
- Number of WHITES murdered (HOVER shows number
of times offender was not identified as white or black) - Number of WHITES murdered by BLACKS (HOVER
shows number of WHITES murdered by WHITES) - Number of BLACKS murdered (HOVER shows number
of times offender was not identified as white or black) - Number of BLACKS murdered by WHITES (HOVER
shows number of BLACKS murdered by BLACKS) COL 1 HOMICIDES is from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, Expanded Offense Data, Expanded Homicide Data Tables, Table 6. See FBI Home Page. - 2. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Persons Arrested,
Violent crime ALL AGES e
- WHITE violent crime against persons (HOVER shows
total violent crimes) - BLACK violent crime against persons (HOVER shows
other than WHITE & BLACK violent crimes) - WHITE violent crimes percentage of total
- BLACK violent crimes percentage of total
COL 2 is from Persons Arrested, FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Persons Arrested and Offenses. FBI Home Page - 3. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Persons Arrested,
Violent crime UNDER 18 e
- WHITE victims of crimes against persons (HOVER shows
WHITE offenders) - BLACK victims of crimes against persons (HOVER shows
BLACK offenders) - WHITE violent crimes percentage of total
- BLACK violent crimes percentage of total
COL 3 is from Persons Arrested, FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Persons Arrested and Offenses. FBI Home Page - 4. FBI National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
Crimes Against Persons f
- WHITE victims (HOVER shows number of WHITE
offenders arrested) - BLACK victims (HOVER shows number of BLACK
offenders arrested) - White offenders arrested are less than number of
White victims - Black offenders arrested are more than number of
Black victims) The last two are my calculations.. they are not part of NIBRS, it just seemed strange to me. COL 4 is from Crimes Against Persons, National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Crimes Against Persons. FBI Home Page
|
Survey Data COLS 5 TO 10.
RAPE,
ROBBERY Completed Property Taken (with Injury),
ROBBERY Attempted To Take Property (with Injury) and
ASSAULT are from the National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS) Table 42.
EMPHASIS ON SURVEY NOT POLICE REPORTS. Source documents.Note: the NCVS for 2009 and beyond compare current year's crime numbers to a year during the Bush Administration and to the prior year in the Obama Administration. The degree of detail vis-a-vis crime is greatly reduced and there is no Table 42 for 2009 and beyond. See footnote c. But there is this the NCVS victimization Analysis Tool (NVAT) separate from the annual reports. Still no Table 42 race of victim/race of offender data that I could find.
See more NCVS information below.
- 5. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
RAPE b
- Number of WHITE victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were BLACK & victims were WHITE
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also WHITE) - Number of BLACK victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were WHITE & victims were BLACK
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also BLACK)
- 6. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
ROBBERY Completed Property Taken (with injury)
- Number of WHITE victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were BLACK & victims were WHITE
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also WHITE) - Number of BLACK victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were WHITE & victims were BLACK
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also BLACK)
- 7. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
ROBBERY Attempted To Take Property (with Injury)
- Number of WHITE victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were BLACK & victims were WHITE
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also WHITE) - Number of BLACK victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were WHITE & victims were BLACK
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also BLACK)
- 8. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
ASSAULT
- Number of WHITE victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were BLACK & victims were WHITE
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also WHITE) - Number of BLACK victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were WHITE & victims were BLACK
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also BLACK)
- 9. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
Female rape victims by race of offenders summed to 1973-1982 totals (thousands)
- Number of WHITE victims summed to 1973-1982
totals, see 1982, numbers are in thousands - percentage of times offenders were BLACK;
HOVER shows percentage of times offenders were WHITE - Number of BLACK victims summed to 1973-1982
totals, see 1982, numbers are in thousands. - percentage of times offenders were WHITE;
HOVER shows percentage of times offenders were BLACK
- 10. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
Female rape victims by race of multiple offenders, summed to 1973-1982 totals (thousands)
- Number of WHITE victims of MULTIPLE offenders summed
to 1973-1982 totals, see 1982, numbers are in thousands - percentage of times multiple offenders were BLACK; HOVER
shows percentage of times multiple offenders were WHITE - Number of BLACK victims of MULTIPLE offenders summed
to 1973-1982 totals, see 1982, numbers are in thousands. - percentage of times multiple offenders were WHITE; HOVER
shows percentage of times multiple offenders were BLACK
- Note: for 1978 - 1982 there is only ROBBERY (with injury)
in the National Criminal Victimization Survey
|
LEOKA Data and ARD Data COLS 11 & 12.
ILLEGAL ALIEN Crime
I wanted to include ILLEGAL alien crime using federal government sources but ..
HOVER table column contents for additional data.
| 0 |
| Year |
| 1978 |
| 1979 |
| 1980 |
| 1981 |
| 1982 |
| 1983 |
| 1984 |
| 1985 |
| 1986 |
| 1987 |
| 1988 |
| 1989 |
| 1990 |
| 1991 |
| 1992 |
| 1993 |
| 1994 |
| 1995 |
| 1996 |
| 1997 |
| 1998 |
| 1999 |
| 2000 |
| 2001 |
| 2002 |
| 2003 |
| 2004 |
| 2005 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| Year |
| 1 |
| 1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 4,954 |
699 |
4,764 |
281 |
| 4,127 |
558 |
3,854 |
247 |
| 3,787 |
520 |
3,646 |
209 |
| 3,728 |
449 |
3,309 |
205 |
| 3,336 |
452 |
2,869 |
154 |
| 3,352 |
417 |
2,927 |
178 |
| 3,644 |
475 |
3,087 |
180 |
| 3,582 |
483 |
3,137 |
227 |
| 3,603 |
501 |
3,147 |
236 |
| 3,727 |
522 |
3,067 |
228 |
| 3,785 |
516 |
3,289 |
230 |
| 3,709 |
573 |
3,303 |
208 |
| 3,587 |
566 |
3,221 |
245 |
| 3,643 |
504 |
3,024 |
230 |
| 3,518 |
454 |
2,867 |
209 |
| 3,327 |
447 |
2,720 |
218 |
| 3,172 |
448 |
2,695 |
193 |
| 3,128 |
431 |
2,648 |
193 |
| 3,005 |
409 |
2,491 |
189 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
| 1 |
| 1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
| 2 e |
| 2.1 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 336,132 |
270,122 |
54.3% |
43.7% |
| 299,010 |
236,343 |
54.6% |
43.2% |
| 284,523 |
205,823 |
56.8% |
41.1% |
| 276,647 |
192,796 |
57.7% |
40.2% |
| 248,120 |
162,264 |
59.2% |
38.7% |
| 248,167 |
156,718 |
59.9% |
37.8% |
| 260,983 |
163,192 |
60.2% |
37.6% |
| 266,681 |
169,525 |
59.7% |
38% |
| 252,366 |
155,199 |
60.5% |
37.2% |
| 255,466 |
154,536 |
60.9% |
36.9% |
| 260,984 |
171,675 |
59.0% |
38.8% |
| 261,553 |
175,712 |
58.5% |
39.3% |
| 265,108 |
175,545 |
58.9% |
39.0% |
| 265,754 |
179,636 |
58.3% |
39.4% |
| 268,346 |
177,766 |
58.7% |
38.9% |
| 254,620 |
163,670 |
59.3% |
38.1% |
| 243,928 |
157,384 |
59.4% |
38.3% |
| 236,394 |
155,088 |
58.7% |
38.5% |
| 228,782 |
151,627 |
58.4% |
38.7% |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 2 e |
| 2.1 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
| 3 e |
| 3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 55,965 |
56,909 |
48.5% |
49.3% |
| 51,335 |
48,192 |
50.3% |
47.2% |
| 46,146 |
38,196 |
53.4% |
44.2% |
| 44,001 |
33,703 |
55.3% |
42.3% |
| 38,529 |
27,551 |
56.8% |
40.6% |
| 36,450 |
27,690 |
55.4% |
42.1% |
| 36,927 |
28,427 |
55.2% |
42.5% |
| 36,297 |
28,448 |
54.7% |
42.8% |
| 34,012 |
29,012 |
52.7% |
45.0% |
| 34,049 |
29,709 |
52.3% |
45.6% |
| 33,780 |
34,897 |
48.2% |
49.8% |
| 34,737 |
37,650 |
47.0% |
51.0% |
| 34,810 |
37,151 |
47.5% |
50.7% |
| 34,360 |
38,005 |
46.6% |
51.6% |
| 31,525 |
35,026 |
46.4% |
51.6% |
| 27,983 |
29,754 |
47.5% |
50.5% |
| 24,529 |
26,854 |
47.0% |
51.4% |
| 21,682 |
23,982 |
46.6% |
51.5% |
| 19,479 |
23,195 |
44.8% |
53.3% |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 3 e |
| 3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
| 4 f |
| 4.1 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 888,744 |
378,912 |
+121,747 |
-83,288 |
| 893,984 |
374,220 |
+125,837 |
-78,657 |
| 860,059 |
370,169 |
+125,669 |
-74,636 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 4 f |
| 4.1 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
| 0 |
| Year |
| 1978 |
| 1979 |
| 1980 |
| 1981 |
| 1982 |
| 1983 |
| 1984 |
| 1985 |
| 1986 |
| 1987 |
| 1988 |
| 1989 |
| 1990 |
| 1991 |
| 1992 |
| 1993 |
| 1994 |
| 1995 |
| 1996 |
| 1997 |
| 1998 |
| 1999 |
| 2000 |
| 2001 |
| 2002 |
| 2003 |
| 2004 |
| 2005 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| Year |
| 5 b c |
| 5.1 |
5.2a |
5.3 |
5.4a |
| 103,000 |
27.9% |
29,000 |
7.3%a |
| 130,000 |
21.5% |
27,000 |
19.8%a |
| 121,000 |
16.0% |
17,000 |
0.0%a |
| 116,000 |
24.0%a |
24,000 |
0.0%a |
| 107,000 |
21.9% |
13,000 |
11.3%a |
| 111,880 |
22.1% |
17,400 |
10.6%a |
| 110,950 |
15.2% |
34,460 |
12.6%a |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 366,320 |
10.4% |
50,600 |
22.6%a |
| 313,080 |
10.1% |
53,670 |
10.1%a |
| 255,260 |
15.3% |
38,330 |
7.9%a |
| 216,710 |
8.8%a |
44,890 |
13.5%a |
| 234,800 |
8.0%a |
43,890 |
0.0%a |
| 225,330 |
9.9%a |
47,430 |
7.2%a |
| 274,020 |
7.3%a |
67,890 |
0.0%a |
| 199,360 |
7.0% |
33,780 |
7.0% |
| 183,160 |
17.1% |
29,980 |
13.4% |
| 134,140 |
13.1% |
59,490 |
14.2 |
| 131,030 |
15.5% |
24,010 |
0.0%a |
| 139,900 |
8.3% |
39,300 |
0.0%a |
| 111,590 |
33.6% |
36,620 |
0.0%a |
| 194,270 |
16.7% |
17,920 |
0.0%a |
| 185,430 |
7.6% |
12,780 |
0.0%a |
| 117,640 |
16.4% |
46,580 |
0.0%a |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 5 b c |
| 5.1 |
5.2a |
5.3 |
5.4a |
| 6 c |
| 6.1 |
6.2a |
6.3 |
6.4a |
| 115,000 |
19.9% |
12,000 |
0.0%a |
| 146,000 |
32.7% |
28,000 |
4.4%a |
| 148,000 |
36.3% |
32,000 |
6.5%a |
| 148,000 |
33.9% |
38,000 |
19.7%a |
| 165,000 |
40.2 |
22,000 |
0.0%a |
| 96,530 |
42.9% |
15,610 |
8.9%a |
| 108,800 |
40.6% |
11,290 |
22.2%a |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 81,180 |
21.6% |
25,850 |
0.0%a |
| 83,990 |
24.6%a |
43,030 |
5.9%a |
| 48,990 |
43.4%a |
36,870 |
6.5%a |
| 92,690 |
27.9% |
30,260 |
12.5%a |
| 97,620 |
31.6% |
28,710 |
0.0%a |
| 70,570 |
21.2%a |
16,800 |
0.0%a |
| 68,300 |
26.7%a |
26,480a |
0.0%a |
| 47,700 |
43.9%a |
7,450a |
37.6%a |
| 72,840 |
36.2%a |
4,720a |
0.0%a |
| 47,810 |
28.3%a |
20,700a |
0.0%a |
| 31,210a |
44.6%a |
21,060a |
0.0%a |
| 48,320 |
11.6%a |
14,680a |
0.0%a |
| 33,400a |
38.5%a |
8,290a |
0.0%a |
| 57,680 |
41.5%a |
13,290a |
0.0%a |
| 55,120 |
30.5%a |
27,010a |
0.0%a |
| 62,190 |
25.5%a |
14,550a |
0.0%a |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 6 c |
| 6.1 |
6.2a |
6.3 |
6.4a |
| 7 c |
| 7.1 |
7.2a |
7.3 |
7.4a |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 49,070 |
46.6% |
13,090 |
15.6% |
| 50,920 |
26.8% |
13,260 |
15.6%a |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 52,260 |
30.6%a |
7,430a |
0.0%a |
| 60,490 |
32.1%a |
10,740a |
25.1%a |
| 21,490a |
10.0%a |
18,210a |
0.0%a |
| 29,440 |
18.0%a |
8,370a |
0.0%a |
| 35,590 |
47.9%a |
12,360a |
0.0%a |
| 34,780 |
42.9%a |
5,710a |
0.0%a |
| 27,210a |
9.2%a |
8,820a |
0.0%a |
| 31,070 |
45.5%a |
11,110a |
0.0%a |
| 42,460 |
44.8%a |
7,530a |
0.0%a |
| 29,390a |
20.6%a |
5,230a |
0.0%a |
| 23,550a |
32.7%a |
3,240a |
0.0%a |
| 25,220a |
20.1%a |
12,920a |
0.0%a |
| 34,160a |
20.8%a |
2,670a |
0.0%a |
| 26,010a |
46.6%a |
10,050a |
40.1%a |
| 16,230a |
12.1%a |
6,870a |
0.0%a |
| 9,680a |
66.7%a |
9,390a |
0.0%a |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 7 c |
| 7.1 |
7.2a |
7.3 |
7.4a |
| 8 c |
| 8.1 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.4 |
| 2,965,000 |
12.5% |
392,000 |
15.0% |
| 3,043,000 |
13.7% |
390,000 |
15.8% |
| 2,860,000 |
10.9% |
363,000 |
12.9% |
| 3,156,000 |
13.0% |
467,000 |
15.2% |
| 3,181,000 |
13.9% |
417,000 |
9.3% |
| 2,970,060 |
12.1% |
399,430 |
12.1% |
| 2,992,930 |
13.4% |
469,800 |
18.0% |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 5,940,020 |
14.3% |
1,025,930 |
14.2% |
| 6,044,870 |
15.4% |
866,390 |
13.7% |
| 5,345,080 |
16.5% |
822,640 |
13.5% |
| 5,060,080 |
15.7% |
802,360 |
13.3% |
| 4,898,360 |
14.7% |
832,970 |
10.8% |
| 4,641,830 |
12.8% |
708,690 |
19.0% |
| 4,150,860 |
12.9% |
677,500 |
12.1% |
| 3,625,250 |
13.1% |
578,690 |
13.9% |
| 3,197,660 |
12.1% |
585,530 |
11.4% |
| 3,098,930 |
12.5% |
487,950 |
17.4% |
| 2,968,710 |
11.1% |
464,110 |
13.6% |
| 3,047,910 |
8.8% |
453,800 |
13.4% |
| 2,822,940 |
11.4% |
415,600 |
12.1% |
| 3,225,070 |
11.1% |
641,270 |
12.3% |
| 2,870,990 |
12.2% |
477,270 |
11.7% |
| 2,472,630 |
13.8% |
438,750 |
19.1% |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 8 c |
| 8.1 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.4 |
| 0 |
| Year |
| 1978 |
| 1979 |
| 1980 |
| 1981 |
| 1982 |
| 1983 |
| 1984 |
| 1985 |
| 1986 |
| 1987 |
| 1988 |
| 1989 |
| 1990 |
| 1991 |
| 1992 |
| 1993 |
| 1994 |
| 1995 |
| 1996 |
| 1997 |
| 1998 |
| 1999 |
| 2000 |
| 2001 |
| 2002 |
| 2003 |
| 2004 |
| 2005 |
| 2006 |
| 2007 |
| 2008 |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| Year |
| 9 s |
| 9.1 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
9.4 |
| s |
s |
s |
s |
| s |
s |
s |
s |
| s |
s |
s |
s |
| s |
s |
s |
s |
| 997,000 |
23% |
211,000 |
8% |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 9 s |
| 9.1 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
9.4 |
| 10 s |
| 10.1 |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.4 |
| s |
s |
s |
s |
| s |
s |
s |
s |
| s |
s |
s |
s |
| s |
s |
s |
s |
| 218,000 |
27% |
50,000 |
? |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 10 s |
| 10.1 |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.4 |
| 11 |
| 11.1 |
11.2 |
11.3 |
11.4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 93 |
37 |
46 |
10 |
| 114 |
60 |
46 |
8 |
| 93 |
50 |
38 |
5 |
| 85 |
34 |
39 |
12 |
| 76 |
38 |
31 |
7 |
| 77 |
45 |
24 |
8 |
| 49 |
27 |
19 |
3 |
| 64 |
44 |
16 |
4 |
| 73 |
45 |
24 |
4 |
| 61 |
37 |
24 |
0 |
| 58 |
31 |
26 |
1 |
| 61 |
27 |
34 |
0 |
| 56 |
36 |
20 |
0 |
| 59 |
25 |
31 |
3 |
| 66 |
35 |
26 |
5 |
| 42 |
20 |
21 |
1 |
| 45 |
24 |
17 |
4 |
| 80 |
32 |
39 |
9 |
| 76 |
44 |
28 |
4 |
| 52 |
31 |
16 |
5 |
| 28 |
15 |
11 |
2 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 11 |
| 11.1 |
11.2 |
11.3 |
11.4 |
| 12 d |
| 12.1 |
12.2 |
12.3 |
12.4 |
12.5 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| 286 |
196 |
109 |
30 |
6 |
| 274 |
215 |
145 |
23 |
16 |
| 283 |
222 |
136 |
24 |
24 |
| 302 |
212 |
164 |
22 |
21 |
| 283 |
249 |
159 |
18 |
36 |
| 258 |
217 |
106 |
14 |
34 |
| 340 |
218 |
130 |
19 |
22 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| 12 d |
| 12.1 |
12.2 |
12.3 |
12.4 |
12.5 |
NOTE: Detail may not add to total shown because of rounding.
N - not available
Footnotes
- * Estimate, based on zero or on about 10 or fewer sample cases, is statistically unreliable.
- ? Too few cases in the survey sample to obtain statistically reliable data.
- a One or more detail of this category was based on zero or on about 10 or fewer sample cases *
- b By 1991 the NCVS questionnaire asked respondents about experiencing forced or coerced sexual behavior in addition to having been attacked. In 1993 the definition of rape was modified to include attempted rape and verbal threats of rape.
- c It appears that the National Criminal Victimization Survey format changed in 2009 and the emphasis is now on how much crime has dropped -- essentially it seems, how much crime has dropped compared to the Bush years and the ongoing Obama years. Though there is a compare dating back to 1993 (Figure 1). They claim the data used in the 2001 to 2008 compares are from NCVS but personally I cannot find the values they use for their compares in the cited NCVS reports. See links below to the 2009 - 2013 and the 1993 - 2008 NCVS pdf files.
For example Table 1 Violent victimization, by type of violent crime, 2003, 2011, and 2012 in Criminal victimization, 2012 dated October 2013 shows the figures for 2003 as
- Rape/sexual assault
- Robbery
- Assault
- 6,645,360
- Aggravated assault 1,362,270
- Simple assault 5,283,100
However the numbers used in Criminal victimization, 2012 for NCVS 2003 statistics may be coming from the NCVS victimization Analysis Tool (NVAT) on the BJS website and not the actual report; for example the Criminal victimization in the United States, 2003 Statistical Tables Table 42 shows
- Rape/sexual assault (single-offender victimizations) as white victim 131,030 and black victim 24,010 --
- even if you add in multiple-offender victimizations numbers (29,500) that's still less than 325,310.
Even with the NCVS victimization Analysis Tool (NVAT) I cannot find data provided pre-2009 by Table 42 Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. If those data lacked 95% degree of confidence then why not eliminate all such data -- if degrees of confidence was the real reason to eliminate Table 42 and not the embarrassing black-on-white vs. white-on-black sexual and other violent crimes? If the data are still there for the public to see I will gladly thank Attorney General Holder for honest race relations talk. But the data are contrary to the lucrative race-grievance industry, et al. claims and are likely now hidden from the Public.
- d TABLE 2 Percent of reported arrest-related deaths, by manner of death, 2003-2009
| Manner of death |
2003-2009 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
| All manners |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
| Homicide |
| by law enforcement |
60.9% |
60.0% |
55.7% |
54.7% |
62.0% |
61.1% |
64.2% |
68.2% |
| by other persons |
0.6% |
0.5% |
0.6% |
0.6% |
0.3% |
0.9% |
0.5% |
0.5% |
| Suicide |
11.2% |
9.6% |
12.5% |
11.9% |
9.3% |
10.5% |
12.1% |
12.9% |
| Intoxication |
10.9% |
13.2% |
12.3% |
13.1% |
10.5% |
11.9% |
8.6% |
6.9% |
| Accidental injury |
5.7% |
8.5% |
6.1% |
6.8% |
5.4% |
4.7% |
4.5% |
4.0% |
| Natural causes |
5.1% |
4.1% |
6.8% |
4.6% |
4.7% |
5.6% |
5.2% |
4.3% |
| Unknown |
5.7% |
4.1% |
5.9% |
8.3% |
7.8% |
5.2% |
4.9% |
3.3% |
| Number of deaths |
4,813 |
627 |
673 |
689 |
721 |
745 |
629 |
729 |
- e Violent crimes are offenses of murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
- f Violent crimes against persons in this table are offenses of Assault; Homicide; Human Trafficking; Kidnapping/Abduction; Sex Offenses; Sex Offenses, Nonforcible
- s 1982 NCVS data summed to 1973-1982 totals see purpose of a decade of data and a little about how NCVS works. The good news is that a single year's data "are too few for detailed statistical analysis." More good news even ten years of data are in some cases too few for detailed statistical analysis.
National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS) 1978 - 2008
- list of National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS) 1978 - 2008
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1978 page 45 Table 43. Personal Crimes of Violence, Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, by type of crime, perceived race of victim and perceived race of offender. 1978
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1979 page 49 Table 43. Personal Crimes of Violence, Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, by type of crime, perceived race of victim and perceived race of offender. 1979
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1980 page 49 Table 43. Personal Crimes of Violence, Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, by type of crime, perceived race of victim and perceived race of offender. 1980
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1981 page 49 Table 44. Personal Crimes of Violence, Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, by type of crime, perceived race of victim and perceived race of offender. 1981
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1982 page 49 Table 44. Personal Crimes of Violence, Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, by type of crime, perceived race of victim and perceived race of offender. 1982
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1983 page 50 Table 44. Personal Crimes of Violence, Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, by type of crime, race of victims, and perceived race of offender. 1983
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1984 page 50 Table 44. Personal Crimes of Violence, Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, by type of crime, race of victims, and perceived race of offender. 1984
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1993 page 45 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1993
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1994 page 41 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1994
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1995 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1995
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1996 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1996
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1997 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1997
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1998 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1998
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 1999 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 1999
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2000 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2000
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2001 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2001
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2002 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2002
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2003 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2003
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2004 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2004
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2005 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2005
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2006 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2006
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2007 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2007
- Criminal victimization in the United States, 2008 Table 42. Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender. 2008
Homicides
FBI Home Page Go directly to the source data.
Persons Arrested, NIBRS, LEOKA
NIBRS You can select National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) at step 4, in Persons Arrested (UCR Publications www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr-publications#Crime) below. Then
- Select NIBRSyyyy, then
- from column on the right
- select Data Tables.
- I used Crimes Against Persons from two tables
- 1) Victims, Race by Offense Category, yyyy;
- 2) Offenders, Race by Offense Category, yyyy.
LEOKA You can select Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) at step 4, in Persons Arrested (UCR Publications www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr-publications#Crime) below. Then
- Select yyyy;
- if you do not go directly to the PDF file (yyyy 2003 and older) then
- for 2004
- on Officers Feloniously Killed and Assaulted page
- select from column on the right under Section 1 Officers Feloniously Killed and 45 tables;
- on Section 1 page from the column on the left
- select Table 42 Law Enforcement Officers Feloniously Killed Profile of Known Assailants, Race and Sex, yyyy-yyyy;
- for 2005 - 2006
- on Officers Feloniously Killed and Assaulted page
- under Officers Feloniously Killed select Access Tables;
- on the Officers Feloniously Killed page
- select Table 42, Law Enforcement Officers Feloniously Killed Profile of Known Assailants, Race and Sex, yyyy-yyyy
- for 2007 - 2013
- on Officers Feloniously Killed and Assaulted page
- under Officers Feloniously Killed select Access Tables;
- on the Officers Feloniously Killed page
- select Table 44, Law Enforcement Officers Feloniously Killed Profile of Known Assailants, Race and Sex, yyyy-yyyy
Persons Arrested
FBI Home Page www.fbi.gov/
- in pull down menu ABOUT US select Criminal Justice Information Services
-
at Criminal Justice Information Services (www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis) select
- Explore Our Services
- Crime Statistics/UCR
-
at UCR (www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr)
- under Explore Our Services
- under Publications
- select Crime in the United States
-
at UCR Publications (www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr-publications#Crime) - under Crime in the United States select year
-
1995 (example year) select Section IV - Persons Arrested (pdf)
- They made some format changes (in 2004 don't have to download pdf files). The path is nearly the same for all except if after selecting the year
- you are presented with Crime in the U.S. yyyy page;
- select Persons Arrested (There may also be a Go to Arrest Tables option under Persons Arrested);
- finally select Table 43 --
Arrest-Related Deaths (ARD)
Of all reported deaths during the process of arrest
- 42% white
- 32% black
- 20% Hispanic.
Of all arrest-related deaths by intoxication
- blacks were 41% of reported decedents,
- whites were 34%, and
- Hispanics were 21%.
Arrest-Related Deaths, 2003-2009 - Statistical Tables Select PDF (1M). See TABLE 3, Number of reported arrest-related deaths, by demographic characteristics, 2003-2009 on Page 4.
ILLEGAL ALIEN crime.
I wanted to use federal data and include ILLEGAL alien crime but as a very informative study (Effects of Illegal Immigration Upon Crime In the United States) pointed out
"[T]he United States government does not readily keep statistics with regard to crimes committed by illegal immigrants. . . there exists a legal obligation [on federal agencies] . . . to report accurately [; e.g.,] the Office of Immigration Statistics, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, and the Government Accountability Office . . . the agencies [provide] raw statistical data with regard to incarcerations, criminal removals (deportations) and arrest information involving illegal immigrants [but as for data on] nationwide criminal prosecutions and convictions of illegal immigrants . . . no such information is kept and reported by the government . . . [in fact illegal alien crimes regularly result in] the criminal removal process rather than prosecuted with the intent to incarcerate them.
However the study did find that information about removal in lieu of prosecution and incarceration of illegal aliens can be seen in the
- Department of Homeland Security Office of Immigration Statistics Yearbook of Immigration Statistics and
- the Bureau of Justice Statistics Reports on Immigration Offenders in the Federal Criminal Justice System.
These provide raw statistical data because the statistics are broken down between criminal removals and non-criminal removals. Example: Table 41. ALIENS REMOVED BY CRIMINAL STATUS AND REGION AND COUNTRY OF NATIONALITY: FISCAL YEARS 2003 TO 2012
|
|
Total |
Criminal |
Non- Criminal |
| 2003 |
211,098 |
83,731 |
127,367 |
| 2004 |
240,665 |
92,380 |
148,285 |
| 2005 |
246,431 |
92,221 |
154,210 |
| 2006 |
280,974 |
98,490 |
182,484 |
| 2007 |
319,382 |
102,394 |
216,988 |
| 2008 |
359,795 |
105,266 |
254,529 |
| 2009 |
391,932 |
131,837 |
260,095 |
| 2010 |
383,031 |
169,656 |
213,375 |
| 2011 |
388,409 |
188,964 |
199,445 |
| 2012 |
419,384 |
199,445 |
219,939 |
| 2013 |
438,421 |
198,394 |
240,027 |
Data for years 2003 through 2012 were obtained from Table 41. ALIENS REMOVED BY CRIMINAL STATUS AND REGION AND COUNTRY OF NATIONALITY: FISCAL YEARS 2003 TO 2012
Data for year 2013 were obtained by
google: yearbook of immigration statistics 2013. You should see something like this:
Search Results Yearbook of Immigration Statistics | Homeland Security www.dhs.gov/yearbook-...United States Department of Homeland Security The Yearbook of Immigration Statistics is a compendium of tables that provides data ... Data tables · Refugees and Asylees: 2013 (view summary and full report).
Yearbook of Immigration ... Table 1. Persons Obtaining Lawful Permanent Resident ...
2013 Refugees and Asylees Table #, Title. Table 13, Refugee Arrivals: 1980 to 2013 (XLS, ...
2013 Enforcement Actions Enforcement Actions Table #TitleTable 33Aliens Apprehen.
US Lawful Permanent Residents U.S. Lawful Permanent Residents: 2013. Summary. A lawful ...
Data tables Table #, Title. Table 25. Nonimmigrant Admissions by ...
2013 Naturalizations Naturalizations. ... Immigration Statistics: 2013 Naturalizations. More results from dhs.gov »
Select 2013 Enforcement Actions, select Table 41 Aliens Removed by Criminal Status and Region and Country of Nationality: Fiscal Years 2004 to 2013 (XLS, 88 KB). The file contains revised data for years 2003 through 2012 obtained from Table 41. ALIENS REMOVED BY CRIMINAL STATUS AND REGION AND COUNTRY OF NATIONALITY: FISCAL YEARS 2003 TO 2012 Some values shown here may be slightly different.
Appendix: National Criminal Victimization Survey.
Emphasis on survey not police reports. The U.S. Department of Justice administers two statistical programs to measure the magnitude, nature, and impact of crime in the nation: the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS).
"NCVS is the nation's primary source of information on criminal victimization. Each year, data are obtained from a nationally representative sample of about 90,000 households, comprising nearly 160,000 persons, on the frequency, characteristics, and consequences of criminal victimization in the United States. Each household is interviewed twice during the year. The survey enables BJS to estimate the likelihood of victimization by rape or sexual assault, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, theft, household burglary, and motor vehicle theft for the population as a whole as well as for segments of the population such as women, the elderly, members of various racial or ethnic groups, city dwellers, and other groups. The NCVS provides the largest national forum for victims to describe the impact of crime and characteristics of violent offenders."
An overall redesign of the victimization survey and the interpretation were developed during the late 1980s and early 1990s.
"The NCVS was fully implemented in 1993 with 70,707 households and 136,747 individuals interviewed. Because the cost of conducting the NCVS grew while congressional funding remained essentially flat for BJS, sample size cuts were implemented to the NCVS over the subsequent 15 years: 12 percent in 1996, 4 percent in 2002, 16 percent in 2006, and 14 percent in 2007 . . . increased funding for the NCVS, [after which] sample sizes were raised. In 2011, 79,802 households and 143,122 individuals were interviewed." See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK202265/
Information on how the U.S. Dept. of Justice National Crime victimization Survey (NCVS) works.
It might explain why so many *'s in the NCVS Table 42 data and why the sexual assault data are so controversial. It's been that way for decades but apparently the Obama-Holder Dept. of Just Us stopped making the information public in 2009 -- and if that was the reason why then so much for honest discussions of race.
"In the course of twice-a-year interviews conducted with more than 125,000 people each year in the National Crime Survey, only about 100 cases of rape or attempted rape are reported. When the sample is compared to the size of the general population, it is estimated that each reported incident represents about 1,200 rapes or rape attempts that took place across the country. Nevertheless, 100 cases are too few for detailed statistical analysis. To obtain enough information for a detailed examination of the crime of rape, all cases of female rape reported in the National Crime Survey from 1973 through 1982 were aggregated into a single data set. The set consists of 1,082 cases representing a national total of 1.5 million instances of rape or attempted rape during the decade."
source
U.S. Department of Justice pdf file
Table 8. Race of female rape victims by race of offenders, 1973-82
| Race of |
|
Race of victims |
| offendersa |
White |
Black |
Other |
Single offender Number |
| (in thousands) |
997 |
211 |
15 |
| Percent who were: |
| White |
70% |
8% |
72% |
| Black |
23% |
89% |
# |
| Other |
6% |
# |
# |
Multiple offenders Number |
| (in thousands) |
218 |
50 |
3 |
| Percent who were: |
| White |
52% |
# |
# |
| Black |
27% |
75% |
# |
| Other |
6 |
# |
# |
| Mixed groups |
14 |
# |
# |
Note: Cases in which race of offenders was not known have been excluded.
# Too few cases in the survey sample to obtain statistically reliable data.
a As perceived by victim.
It's good that
- incidents of violent crime reported by the NCVS sample population are not multitudinous, the number of these violent crimes is relatively tiny; but
- it comes with reduced degrees of confidence in the extrapolation of such tiny numbers for a population of 300-plus million;
- nevertheless the tiny numbers extrapolated for the entire population are indeed tiny even if not with 95% degree of confidence in the precise tiny amount;
- the tiny amount does affect larger amount's degree of confidence, for example when the two should sum to 100 percent.
- The controversy has been known for decades.
- Using multi-year data gives greater degrees of confidence
- yet even with multi-years there is still not enough for ideal degrees of confidence for some calculations.
- Take Col 10 multiple offender statistics data during those ten years individual WHITE females were rape victims 58,860 times by multiple (gangs of) BLACK men, rape victims 30520 times by gangs of mixed race, 13,080 times by gangs of offender race not known or other than WHITE or BLACK men, and 113,360 times by gangs of WHITE men. So the problem of interracial crime is way out of proportion vis-a-vis the population where whites outnumber blacks by six-to-one. And it did not just start here in the 21st Century. Source of population data: White alone 223,553,265 (72.4%) and Black or African American alone 38,929,319 (12.6%); U.S. population 2010 308,745,538.
To: WilliamofCarmichael
2
posted on
04/17/2015 9:29:44 PM PDT
by
jonrick46
(America's real drug problem: other people's money (the Commutist's opium addiction).)
To: jonrick46
3
posted on
04/17/2015 9:30:46 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Blue lives matter)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Whew! You put a lot of effort into that! But sadly, statistical proof does not trump Magic Thinking. The race hustle grievance industry runs on Magic Thinking, fueled by emotive responses manipulated out of dumbed down people.
4
posted on
04/17/2015 9:31:25 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
...and so are property and gasoline prices as people move farther and farther out of cities, even rundown suburban areas, to find a safe haven.
5
posted on
04/17/2015 9:46:31 PM PDT
by
relictele
(Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
To: MHGinTN; WilliamofCarmichael

![]()
Statistics!??!! We don't need no stinkin' statistics!!
6
posted on
04/17/2015 10:37:38 PM PDT
by
Pelham
(The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
statistics don’t mean crap when your an angry black person hell bent on ignoring the law
7
posted on
04/17/2015 11:46:49 PM PDT
by
Bob434
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Saved for future reference.
Thanks for assembling this. Must have been hours of work.
I have some of this stuff in separate files, but it is very good to have it all together.
8
posted on
04/17/2015 11:53:18 PM PDT
by
TChad
(The Obamacare motto: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
9
posted on
04/18/2015 12:34:40 AM PDT
by
Eagles6
(Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Have to look at rates not numbers. Post failed before it started.
To: MHGinTN
RE: statistical proof does not trump Magic Thinking.
Yes. But I can now challenge them to look up UCR, NCVS, NIBRS, LEOKA, and ARD then tell me why they feeeeeeeeeeeeel as they do.
Of course they won't do it. It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to Sharpton or Holder-Obama or [their] antipathy to people who don't feeeeeeeeeeeeeeel like them or anti-social sentiment or anti-conservative sentiment as a way to explain their feeeeeeeeeeeeeeelings.
11
posted on
04/18/2015 5:16:15 AM PDT
by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
12
posted on
04/18/2015 5:53:15 AM PDT
by
dynachrome
(Government can't give us anything that it doesn't first take away)
To: dynachrome
Thanks.
For decades the NCVS had victim race / offender race numbers (Table 42).
Then in 2009 when the Department of Justice was changed over to the Obama-Holder Department of Just Us and Our People that all disappeared. I think the only stats showing interracial crime are the FBI homicide data. There is now an on-line tool for NCVS data but I cannot find Table 42 data.
Those FBI homicide numbers are almost as alarming as the sexual and robbery violence survey numbers are in the NCVS files up through 2008 -- alarming only in the sense that they may get out to the public and totally disprove the lies of the race-grievance industry, the Obama-Holder demagogues, and the MSM employees.
I also posted a table of decades of economic data showing how the Obama Administration compares to other administrations. here
Savage has been making some excellent points lately -- the kind I like to hear and live long enough to see come to pass -- like holding people accountable for things like the election fraud that put (as he calls them) sorority sisters in charge.
13
posted on
04/18/2015 11:23:45 AM PDT
by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Here is a good spot for just Chicago. Despite the name it is a very good breakdown of crime in obozo/emmanuel’s city.
http://heyjackass.com/
14
posted on
04/18/2015 12:37:00 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
(Government can't give us anything that it doesn't first take away)
To: All
See for yourself. U.S. Department of Justice crimes rates by race.
If Black Lives Matter truly was about correcting a problem the U.S. Department of Justice crimes rates by race show where to start.
BLM brings back memories of 1960s street mobs along with campus radical, psycho spoiled brats many of whom along with their ideological litters are now the Establishment.
It's their tactic:
mau-mauing.
meaning.. "to intimidate by hostile confrontation or threats"
See "Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers" by Tom Wolfe
So "Black Lives Matter" merely means black lives mau-mauing --
until all lives matter including babies' lives.
Go here http://www.bjs.gov/
From the Data Analysis Tools dropdown menu (do not click) select
- View Dynamic Tools (do not click)
- Select Arrest Data Analysis Tool
- On the Arrest Data Analysis Tool page
- Select National Estimates
- select from among
- Annual Tables
- Trend Graphs by Sex
- Trend Tables by Sex
- Trend Graphs by Race
- Trend Tables by Race
- Age-Arrest Curves
I chose Trend Tables by Race and selected the items I wanted on the table.
U.S. Arrest Estimates
Arrest Rates of Blacks
| Offense |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
| Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter |
14.8 |
12.9 |
12.5 |
12.8 |
| Population |
41,009,869 |
42,195,018 |
42,689,217 |
43,198,670 |
Arrest Rates of Whites
| Offense |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
| Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
| Population |
246,622,506 |
245,747,686 |
246,957,553 |
248,166,287 |
Arrest Rates of Blacks
| Offense |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
| Forcible Rape |
16.4 |
14.9 |
14.5 |
13.6 |
| Population |
41,009,869 |
42,195,018 |
42,689,217 |
43,198,670 |
Arrest Rates of Whites
| Offense |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
| Forcible Rape |
5.7 |
5.4 |
5.2 |
4.7 |
| Population |
246,622,506 |
245,747,686 |
246,957,553 |
248,166,287 |
These are only two pf the several crime categories available
15
posted on
08/15/2015 5:57:27 PM PDT
by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
16
posted on
08/15/2015 6:01:48 PM PDT
by
5Madman2
(Practicing random acts of Douchebaggery whenever possible)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
Yes, I will cross the street when I see one of these beasts approaching.
I will also grab my concealed carry weapon, cock it, and aim it.
BTW, I have a license to carry.
17
posted on
11/07/2015 3:19:19 PM PST
by
miserare
( "What difference does it make?"~~Benghazi Hil)
To: WilliamofCarmichael
This is an update for the original table above. The update covers the years 2009 - 2014.
HOVER table headers and column contents for additional data.
Arrests Data COLS 1 TO 4.
- 1. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR)
HOMICIDES
- Number of WHITES murdered (HOVER shows number
of times offender was not identified as white or black) - Number of WHITES murdered by BLACKS (HOVER
shows number of WHITES murdered by WHITES) - Number of BLACKS murdered (HOVER shows number
of times offender was not identified as white or black) - Number of BLACKS murdered by WHITES (HOVER
shows number of BLACKS murdered by BLACKS) COL 1 HOMICIDES is from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, Expanded Offense Data, Expanded Homicide Data Tables, Table 6. See FBI Home Page. - 2. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Persons Arrested,
Violent crime ALL AGES e
- WHITE violent crime against persons (HOVER shows
total violent crimes) - BLACK violent crime against persons (HOVER shows
other than WHITE & BLACK violent crimes) - WHITE violent crimes percentage of total
- BLACK violent crimes percentage of total
COL 2 is from Persons Arrested, FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Persons Arrested and Offenses. FBI Home Page - 3. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Persons Arrested,
Violent crime UNDER 18 e
- WHITE violent crimes against persons (HOVER shows
total violent crimes) - BLACK violent crimes against persons (HOVER shows
other than WHITE & BLACK violent crimes) - WHITE violent crimes percentage of total
- BLACK violent crimes percentage of total
COL 3 is from Persons Arrested, FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Persons Arrested and Offenses. FBI Home Page - 4. FBI National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
Crimes Against Persons f
- WHITE victims (HOVER shows number of WHITE
offenders arrested) - BLACK victims (HOVER shows number of BLACK
offenders arrested) - White offenders arrested are less than number of
White victims - Black offenders arrested are more than number of
Black victims) The last two are my calculations.. they are not part of NIBRS, it just seemed strange to me. COL 4 is from Crimes Against Persons, National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Crimes Against Persons. FBI Home Page
|
Survey Data COLS 5 TO 10.
RAPE,
ROBBERY Completed Property Taken (with Injury),
ROBBERY Attempted To Take Property (with Injury) and
ASSAULT are from the National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS) Table 42.
EMPHASIS ON SURVEY NOT POLICE REPORTS. Source documents.This update is for the years 2009 through 2014. These interracial crime data, it appears to me, are no longer released to the public since Barack Obama became president in 2009. If you know where the National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS) Table 42 data for the years following 2008 are available on a federal government web site please post the URLs.
See more NCVS information below.
- 5. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
RAPE b
- Number of WHITE victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were BLACK & victims were WHITE
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also WHITE) - Number of BLACK victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were WHITE & victims were BLACK
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also BLACK)
- 6. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
ROBBERY Completed Property Taken (with injury)
- Number of WHITE victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were BLACK & victims were WHITE
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also WHITE) - Number of BLACK victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were WHITE & victims were BLACK
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also BLACK)
- 7. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
ROBBERY Attempted To Take Property (with Injury)
- Number of WHITE victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were BLACK & victims were WHITE
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also WHITE) - Number of BLACK victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were WHITE & victims were BLACK
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also BLACK)
- 8. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
ASSAULT
- Number of WHITE victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were BLACK & victims were WHITE
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also WHITE) - Number of BLACK victims (HOVER shows percentage of times
victim did not identify offender as white or black) - % of times offenders were WHITE & victims were BLACK
(HOVER shows % of times offenders were also BLACK)
- 9. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
Female rape victims by race of offenders summed to 1973-1982 totals (thousands)
- Number of WHITE victims summed to 1973-1982
totals, see 1982, numbers are in thousands - percentage of times offenders were BLACK;
HOVER shows percentage of times offenders were WHITE - Number of BLACK victims summed to 1973-1982
totals, see 1982, numbers are in thousands. - percentage of times offenders were WHITE;
HOVER shows percentage of times offenders were BLACK
- 10. National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS)
Female rape victims by race of multiple offenders, summed to 1973-1982 totals (thousands)
- Number of WHITE victims of MULTIPLE offenders summed
to 1973-1982 totals, see 1982, numbers are in thousands - percentage of times multiple offenders were BLACK; HOVER
shows percentage of times multiple offenders were WHITE - Number of BLACK victims of MULTIPLE offenders summed
to 1973-1982 totals, see 1982, numbers are in thousands. - percentage of times multiple offenders were WHITE; HOVER
shows percentage of times multiple offenders were BLACK
- Note: for 1978 - 1982 there is only ROBBERY (with injury)
in the National Criminal Victimization Survey
|
LEOKA Data and ARD Data COLS 11 & 12.
HOVER table column contents for additional data.
| 0 |
| Year |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| Year |
| 1 |
| 1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
| 3,518 |
454 |
2,867 |
209 |
| 3,327 |
447 |
2,720 |
218 |
| 3,172 |
448 |
2,695 |
193 |
| 3,128 |
431 |
2,648 |
193 |
| 3,005 |
409 |
2,491 |
189 |
| 3,021 |
446 |
2,451 |
187 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
| 1 |
| 1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
| 2 e |
| 2.1 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
| 268,346 |
177,766 |
58.7% |
38.9% |
| 254,620 |
163,670 |
59.3% |
38.1% |
| 243,928 |
157,384 |
59.4% |
38.3% |
| 236,394 |
155,088 |
58.7% |
38.5% |
| 228,782 |
151,627 |
58.4% |
38.7% |
| 231,750 |
147,002 |
59.4% |
37.7% |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 2 e |
| 2.1 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
| 3 e |
| 3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
| 31,525 |
35,026 |
46.4% |
51.6% |
| 27,983 |
29,754 |
47.5% |
50.5% |
| 24,529 |
26,854 |
47.0% |
51.4% |
| 21,682 |
23,982 |
46.6% |
51.5% |
| 19,479 |
23,195 |
44.8% |
53.3% |
| 19,101 |
21,952 |
45.6% |
52.4% |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 3 e |
| 3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
| 4 f |
| 4.1 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 888,744 |
378,912 |
+121,747 |
-83,288 |
| 893,984 |
374,220 |
+125,837 |
-78,657 |
| 860,059 |
370,169 |
+125,669 |
-74,636 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 4 f |
| 4.1 |
4.2 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
| 0 |
| Year |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| Year |
| 5 b c |
| 5.1 |
5.2a |
5.3 |
5.4a |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 5 b c |
| 5.1 |
5.2a |
5.3 |
5.4a |
| 6 c |
| 6.1 |
6.2a |
6.3 |
6.4a |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 6 c |
| 6.1 |
6.2a |
6.3 |
6.4a |
| 7 c |
| 7.1 |
7.2a |
7.3 |
7.4a |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 7 c |
| 7.1 |
7.2a |
7.3 |
7.4a |
| 8 c |
| 8.1 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.4 |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| c |
c |
c |
c |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 8 c |
| 8.1 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.4 |
| 0 |
| Year |
| 2009 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| Year |
| 9 s |
| 9.1 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
9.4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 9 s |
| 9.1 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
9.4 |
| 10 s |
| 10.1 |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 10 s |
| 10.1 |
10.2 |
10.3 |
10.4 |
| 11 |
| 11.1 |
11.2 |
11.3 |
11.4 |
| 45 |
28 |
17 |
0 |
| 80 |
32 |
39 |
9 |
| 76 |
44 |
28 |
4 |
| 52 |
32 |
17 |
3 |
| 28 |
15 |
12 |
1 |
| 59 |
42 |
13 |
4 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
| 11 |
| 11.1 |
11.2 |
11.3 |
11.4 |
| 12 d |
| 12.1 |
12.2 |
12.3 |
12.4 |
12.5 |
| 340 |
218 |
130 |
19 |
22 |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
| 12 d |
| 12.1 |
12.2 |
12.3 |
12.4 |
12.5 |
Homicides: COLS 1 TO 4. Please see original table above for sources.
Persons Arrested, UCR, NIBRS Arrests Data: COLS 1 TO 4. Please see original table above for sources.
National Criminal Victimization Survey (NCVS) 1978 - 2008 Survey Data: COLS 5 TO 10. Please see original table above for sources.
Arrest-Related Deaths (ARD) LEOKA Data and ARD Data: COLS 11 & 12. Please see original table above for sources.
ILLEGAL ALIEN crime.
I wanted to use federal data and include ILLEGAL alien crime but as a very. Please see original table above.
Appendix: National Criminal Victimization Survey.
. Please see original table above.
Information on how the U.S. Dept. of Justice National Crime victimization Survey (NCVS) works.
NOTE: Detail may not add to total shown because of rounding.
N - not available
Footnotes
- * Estimate, based on zero or on about 10 or fewer sample cases, is statistically unreliable.
- ? Too few cases in the survey sample to obtain statistically reliable data.
- a One or more detail of this category was based on zero or on about 10 or fewer sample cases *
- b By 1991 the NCVS questionnaire asked respondents about experiencing forced or coerced sexual behavior in addition to having been âattackedâ. In 1993 the definition of rape was modified to include attempted rape and verbal threats of rape.
- c Please see footnote c in the original table above.
- d See footnote d above in original table.
- e Violent crimes are offenses of murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
- f Violent crimes against persons in this table are offenses of Assault; Homicide; Human Trafficking; Kidnapping/Abduction; Sex Offenses; Sex Offenses, Nonforcible
- s See footnote s above in original table.
18
posted on
11/09/2015 2:12:09 PM PST
by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson