Skip to comments.
Scientists abandon highly publicized claim about cosmic find
AP ^
| 01/30/2015 2:17 PM
Posted on 01/31/2015 6:03:42 PM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
01/31/2015 6:03:42 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Well, they can always get Jobs promoting Climate Change.
2
posted on
01/31/2015 6:07:40 PM PST
by
Kickass Conservative
(If you think the Mulatto Marxist is bad, just wait until the Menopausal Marxist shows up.)
To: BenLurkin
I’m getting really tired of deflation talk.
3
posted on
01/31/2015 6:07:59 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: BenLurkin
“...cosmic inflation.”
Pretty sure 0bama has this planned for us within the next two years...
4
posted on
01/31/2015 6:08:48 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: BenLurkin
Winter of 2014 --
Scientist #1: I need to publish something quick! They think I don't do anything around here! What should I write about??
Scientist #2: How about the idea that the universe ballooned rapidly a split-second after its birth? It's crazy, but it's kinda catchy.
Scientist #1: That's just the ticket!! Thanks!
Winter of 2015 --
Scientist #1: I need to publish something quick! They think I don't do anything around here! What should I write about??
Scientist #2: How about the idea that the universe didn't balloon rapidly a split-second after its birth? It was a crazy idea, you know.
Scientist #1: That's just the ticket!! Thanks!
5
posted on
01/31/2015 6:14:20 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Malort, turning taste-buds into taste-foes for generations.)
To: cripplecreek
As to the current lack of evidence for the previous inflation claim, Bill Belichick declined to comment
6
posted on
01/31/2015 6:20:11 PM PST
by
mikrofon
(Weekend BUMP)
To: BenLurkin
7
posted on
01/31/2015 6:23:05 PM PST
by
Brother Cracker
(You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
To: BenLurkin
8
posted on
01/31/2015 6:23:17 PM PST
by
HerrBlucher
(Praise to the Lord the Almighty the King of Creation)
To: BenLurkin
9
posted on
01/31/2015 6:27:31 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: BenLurkin
I’ve always thought this idea of the universe ballooning or growing was odd. It implies a frame of reference outside the universe. With the universe being everything, this is not possible.
10
posted on
01/31/2015 6:36:41 PM PST
by
Flick Lives
("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
To: BenLurkin
But what about the big announcement of discovery of ‘Planet X’ (Nibiru), the one behind the sun?? Bring it on!
To: BenLurkin
Well heck, in another couple thousand years or so, they can try it again when we may have something flying around away from the influence of galactic dust or maybe not.
12
posted on
01/31/2015 6:38:24 PM PST
by
The Cajun
(Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
To: Flick Lives
Ive always thought this idea of the universe ballooning or growing was odd. It implies a frame of reference outside the universe.
...
Does it imply an outside reference or are scientists comparing the early Universe to what they observe today?
13
posted on
01/31/2015 6:47:09 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
Seems to me that an expanding universe has to be expanding into a greater void of some sort.
14
posted on
01/31/2015 6:48:51 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: BenLurkin
"the universe ballooned rapidly a split-second after its birthThose not believing in evolution might be happy to learn that neither Darwin or his modern apostle, Steve Jones (author of '"Darwin's Ghost, the origin of species UPDATED"), do not cover the origin of the universe.
Jones does, however, state in his "Historical Sketch",that "... genes are the triumphant proof of the fact of evolution."
Darwin and Jones do not also, mention the speed of light, leaving the thought of a universe ballooning in "a split second", being preposterous.
Go figure!
To: BenLurkin
Actually, this shows a strength of science. A hypothesis must be falsifiable in order to be scientific. This one was shown to be false and sends researchers to a slightly different bent.
16
posted on
01/31/2015 7:02:25 PM PST
by
JimSEA
To: BenLurkin
Back to the old drawing board.
17
posted on
01/31/2015 7:02:38 PM PST
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: OldNavyVet
Sorry ... strike the “neither”
To: Flick Lives
When it’s bigger, it takes longer to get from one place to another. Not sure if you need an outside frame of reference in this case.
To: cripplecreek
20
posted on
01/31/2015 7:39:43 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson