Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Sad part about this is Margaret Sanger was targeting the poor, and was trying to get them out of the "back alley abortions".

Liars. All liars.

1 posted on 01/03/2015 8:29:23 PM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Morgana

maragaret sanger was targeting black people, pure, plain, and simple.


2 posted on 01/03/2015 8:38:13 PM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Boycott wealthy women.


3 posted on 01/03/2015 8:39:08 PM PST by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

The abortion business isn’t exactly a clean business. It’s a bloody business.


4 posted on 01/03/2015 8:39:15 PM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Dead baby is a dead baby....unfair to whom?


5 posted on 01/03/2015 8:40:38 PM PST by high info voter (kwanzaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

“Paging Kermit Gosnell...Pick up the black courtesy phone please.”


6 posted on 01/03/2015 8:48:47 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

“Abortion care”. What an odd term. Who knew there were good abortions and bad abortions.


7 posted on 01/03/2015 8:57:03 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (The trouble with America is that it's full of Americans. - The commie DemocRATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

If black lives really mattered they’d be burning abortion clinics to the ground instead of 7-Elevens.


12 posted on 01/03/2015 9:15:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (If black lives really mattered they'd be burning abortion clinics to the ground instead of 7-Elevens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Everyone who has an abortion receives substandard care.


14 posted on 01/03/2015 9:52:03 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Of the wealthy women seeking abortions in the 21st century, what are primary reasons given?

Wrong sex?
Split with husband?
Interferes with her career (even with mandatory corporate maternity leave now)?
Product of an adulterous affair?

With so many babies born out of wedlock these days (over 40% in general population, no? And over 70% among black women) where is the shame in it anymore? “I can’t have a baby because it’s too shameful!”

These “wealthy” women (and the baby daddies) can afford to raise the kids so it isn’t financial circumstances.

Truly wealthy women don’t even need to work.

So what is the motivation for seeking an abortion?


16 posted on 01/03/2015 9:57:30 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I love it.

They decide where to put their clinics.

They specifically have a policy to put them in areas where black population demos are high.

Then they bitch that white women don’t come to their clinics.

They create the situation they complain about like it’s the fault of other people ....

And they wanted the black clientelle all along because they’re eugenicists.

Talk about creating a false crisis in order to bitch about another contrived problem.

These evil people better enjoy their time on earth because right now, their time on earth is going to be the closest to heaven they are gonna get.


18 posted on 01/03/2015 10:00:10 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
From her web page:

I’m currently supported by an NIH grant in Women’s Health Disparities Research (K12 HD055894).

“Sex, Unintended Pregnancy, and Poverty: One Woman’s Evolution from “Choice” to “Reproductive Justice” in Krista Jacob. Abortion under Attack: Women on the Challenges Facing Choice

I find the transition from "Choice" to "Reproductive Justice" an odd advocacy. It would seem to me that choice brings with it things like the responsibility for the consequences for that choice or its requirements - like paying for it. One could argue that the "choice" to which she refers to is health related and that it is now an ObamaCare right, but the fact that choice is involved puts it down on the side of desire, not need, at least in my opinioni. Further, adding the "Reproductive Justice" tag to it seems to be just pseudo-legal gobbledygook.

I guess she has to talk and think like this if she wants to keep her government grants.

27 posted on 01/04/2015 3:11:55 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

They expected quality, on what Medicaid pays?


29 posted on 01/04/2015 4:17:31 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson