Posted on 12/31/2014 5:55:40 AM PST by Bratch
First things first: the reviews and social media claims arguing that director Angelina Jolies Unbroken somehow short shrifts the Christian faith or the Christianity of its subject are not just untrue, they are preposterous. This cinematic adaptation of the true story of Olympian and WWII Veteran Louis Zamperini has its flaws, but respect and reverence for the Zamperinis Christian faith is not one of them. Quite the opposite.
[...]
Unbroken is the second devoutly Christian WWII film to enjoy a wide studio release in 2014. The first was Fury, an even better movie starring Brad Pitt Jolies husband. Fury and Unbroken are both artistic and commercial achievements thematically and financially rewarded by the exploration of Christian faith.
This is not a hard code to crack.
Jolie and Pitt admit they are not personally religious. They are, however, much more open-minded and tolerant than the bigoted morons behind Noah and Exodus. Between their undeniable talents and respect for others, their careers are now flourishing artistically and commercially in ways that no one would have imagined a decade ago.
For those disappointed Unbroken doesnt cover the second half of Zamperinis life, I have two words for you: Sequel, baby!
P.S. Did I mention that Unbroken is as patriotic as any of John Waynes WWII films?
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
You don’t like a lot of violence in movies, so that’s why you would rename it....Unbalanced.....
Whatever
Saw it last week and he was on with Greta when we got home. I thought his interview with Greta was better than the movie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.