Posted on 11/20/2014 12:03:47 PM PST by Morgana
Another video on YouTube promotes the Bro-choice mentality that if a woman is pregnant she should be forced to have an abortion. Brochoicers are pro-choice men who favor abortion!
The video highlights Andre’s Mobile Abortion Clinic which will was started after Andre’s girlfriend became pregnant a number of times, “I founded this business 14 years ago when my girlfriend was pregnant for the 8th time, and no clinic would abort her baby without her consent and I ain’t hav’n none of that,” Andre the abortion clinic CEO says.
The abortion clinic’s slogan, “Pregnant today – Happy Tomorrow! Three months, nine months who gives a sh** we’ll find ya! “
In true Brochoice style the vid demonstrates their “services” by kidnapping a pregnant woman off the street.
She yells “My Baby” before they force her into their mobile abortion clinic van and murder her child.
Sadly, the reality is that abortions are performed on women against their will or when coerced and it happens far too many times as has been documented in a report by the pro-life group Life Dynamics ( read here).
Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Watch the entire video below- warning graphic images and language ! VIDEO ON LINK
“Brochoicers are pro-choice men who favor abortion! “
I just consider them lower than homosexual pedophiles.
How am I supposed to ask the Lord to be merciful in judgement on this country after seeing something like this?
Devil’s advocate here: If a woman can get pregnant, have a baby and then go to court and force the man to support it, why does the man have no choice in ending the pregnancy?
Comet strikes would be a mercy.
Yet he’s stupid enough to let his license plate be filmed.
93X-LN8 Now can someone tell me what state Andre is in?
It’s just a really tasteless video.
Can a man keep his pants zipped up and not get her pregnant in the first place?
So arrest them and charge them with kidnapping and murder.
What’s the problem?
Devil’s advocate again: Can the woman not keep her legs together? Maybe she can’t afford the $9 a month for birth control pills.
That looks like a Pennsylvania plate to me.
Should they be married first anyway?
You’re so old fashioned. I’ll bet you still think a marriage should be only between a man and a woman. /sarc
Remember the good ol’ days when you could just sacrifice them to a volcano?
“If a woman can get pregnant, have a baby and then go to court and force the man to support it, why does the man have no choice in ending the pregnancy?”
Because we are talking about a human life here.
If they get married and his mother-in-law gets sick and requires financial support, should he have the right to murder her as well?
While doing sidewalk counseling in the 1980s, I witnessed a man trying to get his pregnant mate (don’t know if they were married or not) out of the car. She kept the door locked on her side of the car. He was really mad. He got in the car and drove off. A number of hours later he returned. She exited the car and had obviously been beaten. Her eyes weren’t black yet, but you could tell he had hit her in the head. She went in and had the abortion. At the time no policeman would make a trip to an abortion clinic in order to arrest anyone except someone standing within the property line.
That isn’t the point. If the mother can terminate the pregnancy any time because she doesn’t want to be a mother, why does the father have no choice in the matter?
Again, if a man does not want to support a child, he needs to keep it zipped. If he can’t, then may I suggest either a vasectomy or pay for the services of a professional to satisfy his needs.
But if a woman doesn’t want a baby she gets an abortion. Why isn’t there a law that prevents forced fatherhood?
that video sure looks like a take-off. The driver looks like a she not a he.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.