Devil’s advocate here: If a woman can get pregnant, have a baby and then go to court and force the man to support it, why does the man have no choice in ending the pregnancy?
Can a man keep his pants zipped up and not get her pregnant in the first place?
“If a woman can get pregnant, have a baby and then go to court and force the man to support it, why does the man have no choice in ending the pregnancy?”
Because we are talking about a human life here.
If they get married and his mother-in-law gets sick and requires financial support, should he have the right to murder her as well?
Men shouldn’t do things that will get a woman pregnant if he isn’t man enough to raise a child. Sex is for real men according to God.
Because ending the pregnancy requires a surgical/medical intervention on the woman, something she can choose but he would have to force upon her.