Skip to comments.
Not So Far
October 24, 2014
| Stephen Smith
Posted on 11/12/2014 7:19:53 PM PST by Swordmaker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: 1FreeAmerican; A. Patriot; AndrewC; antonia; aristotleman; Boogieman; Carilisa; commonguymd; ...
Red Shift has problems in an Electric Universe Ping
If you want on or off the Electric Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.
2
posted on
11/12/2014 7:22:37 PM PST
by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: SunkenCiv
3
posted on
11/12/2014 7:29:18 PM PST
by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: Swordmaker
you mean the science is not settled?
4
posted on
11/12/2014 7:31:40 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: GeronL
Not only is the “Science not settled” they can’t even buy a clue.
5
posted on
11/12/2014 7:39:32 PM PST
by
Fai Mao
(Genius at Large)
To: Swordmaker
Has the current crop of scientists been able to determine the approximate time of arrival of the next Albert Einstien?
6
posted on
11/12/2014 7:55:26 PM PST
by
HandyDandy
(Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
To: HandyDandy
Has the current crop of scientists been able to determine the approximate time of arrival of the next Albert Einstien? He's probably already arrived and been thrown out in a garbage can. . . aborted.
7
posted on
11/12/2014 7:56:47 PM PST
by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: GeronL
you mean the science is not settled? Not when you find objects with high red-shifts that are apparently within our own Galaxy. . . no, you cannot say it is settled. Nor, when it is apparent there is a quantum nature to red-shifting.
8
posted on
11/12/2014 7:58:34 PM PST
by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Swordmaker
That same thought scares the hell out of me.
9
posted on
11/12/2014 8:11:43 PM PST
by
HandyDandy
(Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
To: Swordmaker
as always, consensus is not a property of true science and neither apparently is constant distance a property of redshift.
10
posted on
11/12/2014 9:00:49 PM PST
by
dadfly
To: dadfly
as always, consensus is not a property of true science and neither apparently is constant distance a property of redshift. They don't want to have to rewrite and republish all those pesky textbooks. It's much more convenient to just ignore all that stuff that doesn't fit their Universe view. Maybe it will just go away. . . before the death of the Universe comes around. . . and they have to explain how the mucked up.
11
posted on
11/12/2014 9:14:19 PM PST
by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Swordmaker
right. it’s much easier for them to continuously redefine the “scientific” method until it fits their original conclusion ;).
12
posted on
11/12/2014 9:23:49 PM PST
by
dadfly
To: Fai Mao; Swordmaker
more questions than answers
real science
13
posted on
11/12/2014 9:35:09 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: dadfly
From the same scientists that keep telling us the universe is finite...
14
posted on
11/12/2014 9:36:25 PM PST
by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus-)
To: logi_cal869
publish or perish. humility, integrity and dilligence seem to be rare qualities among these types, after all they are the brightest of the bright, and a deficit of knowledge is for them a deficit of character.
but these humble traits along with a burning curiosity about the world and how it works, and most often with a firm belief in God, have been the essential traits of the scientists who have most successfully read the book of nature. Gregor Mendel comes to mind along with many such others.
15
posted on
11/12/2014 9:58:06 PM PST
by
dadfly
To: HandyDandy
Has the current crop of scientists been able to determine the approximate time of arrival of the next Albert Einstien? I've often wondered how many Einsteins we missed because of where they were born. Eating grubs in Africa or whale blubber in the arctic
or even here in such bad circumstances they never got the chance to excel.
16
posted on
11/13/2014 7:22:49 AM PST
by
TangoLimaSierra
(To win the country back, we need to be as mean as the libs say we are.)
To: TangoLimaSierra
Or maybe he kept staring out the classroom window, with some strange and obsessive fascination with light, .........and got put on Ritalin.
17
posted on
11/13/2014 9:07:42 AM PST
by
HandyDandy
(Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
To: Swordmaker; left that other site; 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; ...
18
posted on
11/13/2014 9:43:29 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
To: brytlea; cripplecreek; decimon; bigheadfred; KoRn; Grammy; steelyourfaith; Mmogamer; dayglored; ...
Thanks for the pings Swordmaker and left that other site, extra to APoD.
19
posted on
11/13/2014 9:44:15 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
To: Swordmaker
How is a picture of Dennis Rodman’s hair a science thingy?
20
posted on
11/13/2014 9:51:38 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson