To: 1FreeAmerican; A. Patriot; AndrewC; antonia; aristotleman; Boogieman; Carilisa; commonguymd; ...
Red Shift has problems in an Electric Universe Ping
If you want on or off the Electric Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.
2 posted on
11/12/2014 7:22:37 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Swordmaker
you mean the science is not settled?
4 posted on
11/12/2014 7:31:40 PM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Swordmaker
as always, consensus is not a property of true science and neither apparently is constant distance a property of redshift.
10 posted on
11/12/2014 9:00:49 PM PST by
dadfly
To: Swordmaker
I wonder how we would seem from that side of the universe.
22 posted on
11/13/2014 12:18:19 PM PST by
onedoug
To: Swordmaker
To: Swordmaker
Cosmological redshift has been shown to be a property of matter and not one of velocity. He's claiming that there is no Doppler effect here?
Not when you find objects with high red-shifts that are apparently within our own Galaxy
High red shift within our own galaxy means high velocity. The only reason higher and higher red shifts was associated with greater and greater distance was because it equated to an early expansion phase of the universe.
Two objects 100k light years distant, one receding at twice the rate of the second must produce different red shifted frequencies.
25 posted on
11/14/2014 2:14:02 PM PST by
SunTzuWu
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson