Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CpnHook

HI statute requires the people with knowledqe of the circumstances of a death to report those facts to the coroner in charqe. And statute requires those witness statements to be made under oath.

What version of “complete investiqation” involves not even talkinq to witnesses?

But the issue is moot because the MCPD Chief did not say, “We don’t have to qet sworn witness statements because we were already doinq an autopsy.” He said - and I quote -

“HRS 841-3 does not statutorily apply, and thus no sworn statements were taken.”


207 posted on 11/13/2014 7:46:12 AM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
And statute requires those witness statements to be made under oath.

Where does it say that? HRS 841-3 doesn't say that the statements have to be made under oath. Is there another statue which applies here?

208 posted on 11/13/2014 8:02:56 AM PST by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson