Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
And statute requires those witness statements to be made under oath.

Where does it say that? HRS 841-3 doesn't say that the statements have to be made under oath. Is there another statue which applies here?

208 posted on 11/13/2014 8:02:56 AM PST by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: ConstantSkeptic

HRS 841-4 says it.

And the Chief’s response indicates that he understands sworn witness statements to be required IF HRS 841-3 is in effect. He says it is NOT in effect.

The only way for it to not be in effect is if one of these 4 conditions was the true situation:

1) nobody died
2) nobody died in the circumstances that HRS 841-3 requires a complete investiqation
3) somebody died under HRS 841-3 circumstances but it was outside MCPD’s jurisdiction
4) somebody died in HRS 841-3 circumstances in MCPD jurisdiction but MCPD was never notified of the death

Which one of those was the case for the incident on Dec 11, 2013? Bear in mind what I just told another poster based on HI statutes: if she first simultaneously lost pulse and breathinq while she was in the water then the death (if it had happened) would clearly be within Maui County’s jurisdiction.


210 posted on 11/13/2014 8:11:11 AM PST by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson