Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maybe it wasn't the Higgs particle after all
Phys dot org ^ | November 07, 2014 | blogger

Posted on 11/09/2014 4:21:25 PM PST by SunkenCiv

Last year CERN announced the finding of a new elementary particle, the Higgs particle. But maybe it wasn't the Higgs particle, maybe it just looks like it. And maybe it is not alone.

Many calculations indicate that the particle discovered last year in the CERN particle accelerator was indeed the famous Higgs particle. Physicists agree that the CERN experiments did find a new particle that had never been seen before, but according to an international research team, there is no conclusive evidence that the particle was indeed the Higgs particle...

"The CERN data is generally taken as evidence that the particle is the Higgs particle. It is true that the Higgs particle can explain the data but there can be other explanations, we would also get this data from other particles", Mads Toudal Frandsen explains. The researchers' analysis does not debunk the possibility that CERN has discovered the Higgs particle. That is still possible - but it is equally possible that it is a different kind of particle.

"The current data is not precise enough to determine exactly what the particle is. It could be a number of other known particles", says Mads Toudal Frandsen. But if it wasn't the Higgs particle, that was found in CERN's particle accelerator, then what was it?

"We believe that it may be a so-called techni-higgs particle. This particle is in some ways similar to the Higgs particle - hence half of the name", says Mads Toudal Frandsen.

Although the techni-higgs particle and Higgs particle can easily be confused in experiments, they are two very different particles belonging to two very different theories of how the universe was created.

(Excerpt) Read more at phys.org ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: cern; higgsboson; neutrinodeficiency; stringtheory; technihiggs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: SunkenCiv

I heard somewhere that if the LHC can’t find the Higgs Boson then the math which predicted it needs to be looked at for errors.


21 posted on 11/09/2014 6:11:46 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Those look like Biggs Hoseons.


22 posted on 11/09/2014 6:12:06 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Could he whistle?


23 posted on 11/09/2014 6:12:15 PM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon; tet68

Vanishing socks generally show up in the hozone layer.


24 posted on 11/09/2014 6:13:55 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I'm not surprised at this.

News reports about this “discovery” were often expressed with qualifications, and interviewed experts often refused to put their reputations on the line by bluntly saying, “Yes, this is the Higgs particle.”

I also thought the emotional response of the Physics community was subdued.

I'll guess that when the quark was confirmed in 1968, there was real jubilation and many physicists were thrilled.

The fact that it cost $6 billion to build the LHC, and another $1 billion each year to run and maintain it, might be a powerful incentive to mislead the public about what exactly was discovered.

25 posted on 11/09/2014 6:16:55 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bajabaja

I think I wound up having to edit it out of the excerpt, but the Higgs was predicted (actually needed, it’s a mathematical kludge) by the Standard Model; so were massless neutrinos. Since the late 1960s several longterm experiments were set up to detect neutrinos, and failed to turn up any (for all practical purposes; the level of apparent hits was the kind of background level one would expect to find in interstellar space). Since the Sun is quite close by, we should be awash in them.

Then about ten years ago, a really purpose-built experiment was begun. It appeared to find neutrinos. Unfortunately the detected whatevers had mass.

Soooo, it was decided that neutrinos had been found after all, but that they changed from massless to massful while making the trip from the Sun. Standard Model was upheld.


26 posted on 11/09/2014 6:18:34 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

+1.


27 posted on 11/09/2014 6:21:28 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

It’s all about the hunt for a Nobel Prize.

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/


28 posted on 11/09/2014 6:26:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen; BenLurkin; left that other site

There were earlier attempts to find the Higgs, all failed, and the results of the LHC were not really in accord with expectations. But that’s okay too, if we already knew everything, there’d be nothin’ to do.


29 posted on 11/09/2014 6:29:12 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Thank you!

(My First ever!)


30 posted on 11/09/2014 6:30:48 PM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I wouldn’t want to know everything. It would take all the mystery out of life!

:-)

(I love these science threads, even though i don’t completely understand them! LOL!)


31 posted on 11/09/2014 6:32:15 PM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

didn’t they notice the little “H” on each particle???


32 posted on 11/09/2014 6:33:39 PM PST by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet

They were still scraping the whiteout off the glass from some earlier spreadsheet corrections.


33 posted on 11/09/2014 6:50:25 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

There were a lot of bets placed on whether it was or not, so much so that bookies dubbed it the Viggs.

Okay, I’m not sure that was worth the setup.


34 posted on 11/09/2014 6:55:07 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Zeneta
kinda like Reese’s Crunchy peanut butter cups? The same as regular Reese’s, but different.

Yes, it's exactly like that. Except instead of Reese’s Crunchy peanut butter cups, a grilled cheese sandwich with tomatoes. And instead of regular Reese's, celery sticks. Otherwise, that's it.

35 posted on 11/09/2014 10:10:45 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Soooo, it was decided that neutrinos had been found after all, but that they changed from massless to massful while making the trip from the Sun. Standard Model was upheld.

Good thing no one invoked the Electric Universe Theory. Otherwise people might think physics is just politically driven, black-ops controlled pseudoscience.

36 posted on 11/09/2014 10:14:55 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“Since the late 1960s several longterm experiments were set up to detect neutrinos, and failed to turn up any ...”

I think I saw somewhere that lack of neutrino emissions from the sun (if the theories about what stars are is correct) signals that the furnace, so to speak, has gone out, and the sun is beginning the journey toward expansion/collapse. What do you think?


37 posted on 11/10/2014 2:07:56 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

On the USS Eldridge. . .perhaps?


38 posted on 11/10/2014 8:15:52 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

So experimental results (mass-off, then mass-on) that didn’t fit the Standard Model were made to fit the Standard Model.

It’s the opposite of Lois Lerner’s emails. They did exist, then they didn’t.

I think it’s called Standard Operating Procedure.


39 posted on 11/10/2014 10:07:25 PM PST by bajabaja (Too ugly to be scanned at the airports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson