To: Impy; campaignPete R-CT; GOPsterinMA; AuH2ORepublican; mykroar; dfwgator
Let me say up front that I never knew the whole story.
I guess my question is - was it ever proven beyond a shadow of doubt that he bet against his own team while he was playing?
If not, then let him in the Hall.
If so, then no.
71 posted on
10/21/2014 6:43:54 PM PDT by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: NFHale; Impy; hockeyfan44; AuH2ORepublican; mykroar; dfwgator
My recollection (and the complete Dowd Report is available online) was they had irrefutable proof against Rose; that’s why he agreed to the ban.
He knew they had him.
I predict they’ll let him in posthumously.
72 posted on
10/21/2014 6:51:27 PM PDT by
GOPsterinMA
(I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson