To: NFHale; Impy; hockeyfan44; AuH2ORepublican; mykroar; dfwgator
My recollection (and the complete Dowd Report is available online) was they had irrefutable proof against Rose; that’s why he agreed to the ban.
He knew they had him.
I predict they’ll let him in posthumously.
72 posted on
10/21/2014 6:51:27 PM PDT by
GOPsterinMA
(I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
To: GOPsterinMA; Impy; hockeyfan44; AuH2ORepublican; mykroar; dfwgator
RE irrefutable proof:
That being true, then no, he doesn’t deserve it, record notwithstanding...
Rigging the game is wrong, period.
73 posted on
10/21/2014 6:55:58 PM PDT by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson