Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EveningStar

2001 is the all time winner for bad endings. It seems as if they just ran out of ideas and hoped everyone was stoned while they burned up miles of film on light show garbage.


8 posted on 10/13/2014 7:58:13 PM PDT by Baynative (Did you ever notice that atheists don't dare sue Muslims?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Baynative

The ending of 2001 is perfect.


41 posted on 10/13/2014 8:37:00 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative

Come on! The star baby! Get with it!

Hey, I ate it up.


71 posted on 10/13/2014 9:37:51 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative; Borges; dr_lew
It seems as if they just ran out of ideas and hoped everyone was stoned while they burned up miles of film on light show garbage.

Actually, here's what happened.

Throughout Arthur C. Clarke's original novel there are references to Cold War tensions on Earth while space exploration is going on. At the end of the book, The Astronaut (Dave) is taken through the thing that's "full of stars." He visits the head-shop, the light-show and takes the trip. When he comes out the other side, the beings responsible for giving certain chimpoids a quantum leap to become human, the monolith on the moon, and the thing that's "full of stars," have transformed Dave into a semi-omnipotent being just in time to save the world from a nuclear holocaust, which has just begun. With a wave of his now super-powerful embryonic hands, Dave The Star Child neutralizes all the nuclear weapons.

The ending of the film was ruined by Kubrick. He was already famous for Dr. Strangelove, and did not want the ending to be another nuclear war. So ... he simply bailed, and decided to and make it completely incomprehensible, rather than have the Star Child save us from the nuclear holocaust which ties the whole thing together. That's why the ending sucks.

And you're right: it does suck.

78 posted on 10/13/2014 10:30:14 PM PDT by FredZarguna (His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative
2001 is the all time winner for bad endings. It seems as if they just ran out of ideas and hoped everyone was stoned while they burned up miles of film on light show garbage.

2001 was a lousy film -- PERIOD! It was completely unintelligible from start to finish. However, it was a good movie to get stoned to as I saw many people toking pot in the movie theater.

101 posted on 10/14/2014 2:26:42 AM PDT by Stepan12 (Our present appeasement of Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Baynative; All
2001 is the all time winner for bad endings. It seems as if they just ran out of ideas and hoped everyone was stoned while they burned up miles of film on light show garbage.

It is incomprehensible, until you read the book; that explains the ending much better than they did in the movie.
106 posted on 10/14/2014 4:55:18 AM PDT by notdownwidems (Shellback pollywogs! U.S.S. William H. Standley, CG-32 1977-80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson