To: FlJoePa
2 Sandusky, as a professor emeritus, had access to any building that he desired at Penn State. In other words, he didnt need permission from JoePa or anyone else to go into the football building.
So does this "emeritus" title mean Sandusky can enter the football building if he ever gets out of prison? Nope, Penn State finally pulled his access in late 2011, when the scandal was out in the open. They could have done so at any time after the first report of Sandusky's child abuse in 1998, but no one was paying attention before then.
3 Sandusky targeted his victims through his charity, The Second Mile, and not through Penn State or its football program. The Second Mile, much more than Penn State, deserves blame for this tragedy.
Over the next ten-year period, Sandusky "was frequently at the Lasch Building working out, showing up at campus events that Penn State supported...He was showering with young boys, staying in dormitories...There are more red flags than you could count, over a long period of time."
"Consequently, out of the 10 young boys that Sandusky would be convicted of sexually assaulting, most of them were abused after he was investigated in 1998 at least five of them were assaulted "at Penn States football facilities and other places on campus after May 1998""[Freeh Report].
6 JoePa actually went one step further and also told the man who is in charge of Penn States police force about it.
Why didn't he tell a member of Penn State's police force - an actual law enforcement officer instead of PSU's senior VP for finance and business - the so-called "man in charge of Penn State's police force"?
PSU's football program should have been suspended voluntarily by it's administration for several years - the misplaced priorities of this program are beyond belief.
To: AnotherUnixGeek
The freeh report (in case you haven’t noticed) isn’t factual. It’s a fairy tale - made up to satisfy the PSU bot (freeh’s client) in an effort to explain their incredibly arrogant decision making.
36 posted on
09/23/2014 8:47:09 PM PDT by
FlJoePa
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Sanduskys access to the facility was part of his exit contract. Absent actual proof of wrongdoing PSU could not suspend his privileges without legal jeopardy. Your next quotation, taken from the fact free report is more nonsense. There was no evidence of these crimes until the grand jury investigation of Sandusky. PSU had no more evidence of those crimes than did Louis Freeh, or for that matter, you. Does that make YOU guilty of a cover up? By your “logic” it does.
41 posted on
09/23/2014 9:04:59 PM PDT by
FredZarguna
(His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
To: AnotherUnixGeek
He was not a so called man in charge of the police. He WAS the man in charge of the police. Nice attempt at deflection, but again, its contrary to the actual facts.
42 posted on
09/23/2014 9:08:09 PM PDT by
FredZarguna
(His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson