[FredZarguna]

Sanduskys access to the facility was part of his exit contract. Absent actual proof of wrongdoing PSU could not suspend his privileges without legal jeopardy. Your next quotation, taken from the fact free report is more nonsense. There was no evidence of these crimes until the grand jury investigation of Sandusky. PSU had no more evidence of those crimes than did Louis Freeh, or for that matter, you. Does that make YOU guilty of a cover up? By your “logic” it does.

[FlJoePa]

louis freeh = honorable, trustworthy

Joe Paterno = Disgraced pedophile protector

Welcome to what used to be Free Republic.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

Absent actual proof of wrongdoing PSU could not suspend his privileges without legal jeopardy.

And yet they did exactly that in 2011, before Sandusky was finally convicted.

And the "professor emeritus" title isn't exactly a requirement for retiring football assistant coaches. Sandusky retired after the investigation of a 1998 abuse case - the Pennsylvania attorney general's report on the case stated "Sandusky admitted showering naked with Victim 6, admitted to hugging Victim 6 while in the shower and admitted that it was wrong".

Why would Penn State think it appropriate to award an Emeritus title to a football coach who had just come through a child sexual abuse investigation and admitted to showering naked with a child? Where is the judgment or common sense on that campus?

[TexasGator]

His exit contract was made based on his previous molestation.