I am ABSOLUTELY OPPOSED to lowering the voting age./rwa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: right-wing agnostic
voting should be done at age 21, you can’t drink , but you can decide an election. That doesn’t even make sense, nor does letting kids vote who know nothing of the world
2 posted on
09/19/2014 2:57:50 PM PDT by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: right-wing agnostic
Social scientists advocate voting at age 16.
Social scientists also say that 16 year olds should not be held responsible for crimes the way adults are, because their pre-frontal cortices are not fully developed yet, and so they lack the judgment and impulse control that adults have.
Pick one, social scientists, pick one.
3 posted on
09/19/2014 2:58:31 PM PDT by
wideawake
To: right-wing agnostic
4 posted on
09/19/2014 2:58:38 PM PDT by
tje
To: right-wing agnostic
Should we let 16 year olds vote?
Oh
Hell
No
5 posted on
09/19/2014 2:58:48 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: right-wing agnostic
No, 1000 times no! We need tests (intelligence and citizenship) before anyone should be allowed to vote. We see the terrible results of uniformed voting (and poor candidates).
6 posted on
09/19/2014 2:59:27 PM PDT by
luvbach1
(We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
To: right-wing agnostic
Only if they pay taxes.
Why do we allow non-tax paying adults to vote?
They will always vote for politicians who will handout our tax money to the freeloaders.
7 posted on
09/19/2014 3:00:08 PM PDT by
entropy12
(Marxist, race baiter, community organizer Obummer is a 8 year curse on the country.)
To: right-wing agnostic
Most 18 year old “adults” are too immature to really understand what they are voting for. Sixteen? No way.
To: right-wing agnostic
What could possibly go wrong??
9 posted on
09/19/2014 3:02:04 PM PDT by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: right-wing agnostic
We already have too many people voting. Let them start supporting themselves and being subject to paying taxes.
To: right-wing agnostic
11 posted on
09/19/2014 3:02:44 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: right-wing agnostic
I say raise the voting age to 30.
Seriously.
12 posted on
09/19/2014 3:03:19 PM PDT by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
To: right-wing agnostic
I would normally be opposed to letting 16 year olds vote. I would be in favor, however, of allowing 13 year olds and above to vote provided we do away with this idea of adolescents not being responsible for their actions and we try all those individuals 13 and up who commit crimes as adults and sentence them as adults.
To: right-wing agnostic
No!
I think it should be limited to property owners.
One needs skin in the game.
15 posted on
09/19/2014 3:04:15 PM PDT by
hadaclueonce
(Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
To: right-wing agnostic
They should vote when they are off their parent’s insurance policies.
To: right-wing agnostic
What is the age Obama care considers to be an adult, no longer eligible to be on mommy and daddy’s insurance? Is it 26, 27? That should be the new voting age. Maybe by then some will have figured it out.
19 posted on
09/19/2014 3:07:35 PM PDT by
Tammy8
To: right-wing agnostic
They shouldn’t have lowered it to 18.
To: right-wing agnostic
22 posted on
09/19/2014 3:09:52 PM PDT by
Fungi
(Do not read this post if you are nervous about tomorrow. I am so I will not read it.)
To: right-wing agnostic
Voting age should be raised to 25, and no women voters. putting on my nomex suit
24 posted on
09/19/2014 3:10:41 PM PDT by
Figment
To: right-wing agnostic
Voting at 16?
Uhmmmm, sure and you can make them fully, wholly and solely responsible for contracts.
They are fully emancipated.
They can smoke.
They can drink.
They can shoot foreigners in wars.
Statutory rape would only apply to those under 16 years of age.
they could filmed in certain provacative situations.
Yeah, cuz most 16 year olds are ready to handle life, its vagaries and stark consequences.
/S
25 posted on
09/19/2014 3:11:50 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: right-wing agnostic
Five year olds...definitely five year olds!
26 posted on
09/19/2014 3:11:53 PM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson