I am afraid you are on to a loser here my friends.
Too many posters here find the concept of “free” and “republic” to be way too complicated for them.
You see that silly document called the Constitution only applies to them and people who look like them and dress like them and think like them and vote like them and agree with them.
It doesn’t apply to a black woman wearing, you know extremely slutty clothes like, er, a white tee-shirt and baggy shorts on a sunny Sunday afternoon.
George III would have loved some of the posters here.
Why have you addressed this to me? Did you not comprehend my post? I thought I was quite clear in asking about the lack of Probable Cause.
Then again,,,, maybe I was to quick about responding! Perhaps I didn’t comprehend your post at first quick reading? Perhaps I’m getting touchy, having received a couple posts that clearly didn’t “comprehend” mine. Sorry if that’s the case!
>>It doesn’t apply to a black woman wearing, you know extremely slutty clothes like, er, a white tee-shirt and baggy shorts on a sunny Sunday afternoon.
George III would have loved some of the posters here.<<
Ain’t that the damn truth.
They want to despise a probable-liberal actor more than uphold the USC.
They also will be the first to run waving their papers when asked for them by the new SS saying “look at me, I am a good Citizen of the Demokracy!!”
OK, a “free” “republic” is one in which police responding to a complaint of illegal activity who arrive on the scene and see apparent evidence of the validity of the complaint must allow any of the participants to immediately leave.
No investigation is allowed.
Come on, I hope we can agree that people with such a view understand neither ‘free’ nor ‘republic’.