Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USDA: Cost to raise child up slightly to $245,340
Associated Press ^ | Aug. 18, 2014 2:00 PM EDT

Posted on 08/18/2014 9:02:57 PM PDT by Olog-hai

A message for new parents: get ready for sticker shock.

A child born in 2013 will cost a middle-income American family an average of $245,340 until he or she reaches the age of 18, with families living in the Northeast taking on a greater burden, according to a report out Monday. And that doesn’t include college—or expenses if a child lives at home after age 17.

Those costs that are included—food, housing, childcare and education—rose 1.8 percent over the previous year, the Agriculture Department’s new “Expenditures on Children and Families” report said. …

(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Education; Society
KEYWORDS: childrearing; usda

1 posted on 08/18/2014 9:02:57 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

That’s cheap. Americans should start having and raising their own kids again. These “unaccompanied minors” we’re importing in from Central America to be our next generation are turning out to be very “high maintenance”. They’re going to cost us a hell of a lot more than a quarter of a million each.


2 posted on 08/18/2014 9:07:03 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (America is not a refugee camp! It's my home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If you have to ask how much a kid will cost, you’re probably not ready to have one.


3 posted on 08/18/2014 9:10:53 PM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchillcide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Look expensive, they’re raising some rich kid? I don’t think my parent spent more than $50k


4 posted on 08/18/2014 9:10:59 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouchthatonehurt

The welfare mothers never ask, and they are certainly never ready to have them despite having them.


5 posted on 08/18/2014 9:14:07 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

13,630 per year to raise a kid? That’s one fat kid.


6 posted on 08/18/2014 9:15:07 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They don’t have children...they have dependent beneficiaries.


7 posted on 08/18/2014 9:16:37 PM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchillcide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They don’t have children...they have dependent beneficiaries.


8 posted on 08/18/2014 9:16:47 PM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchillcide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ouchthatonehurt

Great how the libs invent ever-dehumanizing terms, right?


9 posted on 08/18/2014 9:17:31 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yeah, sad.


10 posted on 08/18/2014 9:18:06 PM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchillcide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Triple that for the college years.


11 posted on 08/18/2014 9:40:28 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Why would you “raise a child up slightly” ?


12 posted on 08/18/2014 9:49:16 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

You can have kids, or you can have money. Guess which one is actually more rewarding?


13 posted on 08/18/2014 9:52:25 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Unless you’re on the dole! Then preschool, daycare, food, housing, phone utilities, college, are all FREE or drastically reduced. For you anyway. Too bad for the workers who pay for their kids and yours too.


14 posted on 08/18/2014 9:57:58 PM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

How silly.


15 posted on 08/18/2014 10:01:09 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

Good example of externalization of costs. The poor do that with breeding.

I asked a poor person this in Jamaica and in a third world-dominated U.S. City. Why so many kids? “Well one might make it and take care of you. It happens, mon.”

Taxpayers pay the pre-natal and healthcare, food, Section 8, free phone, free daycare, free breakfast and lunch, free this free that. Externalize cost. Prison. YOU pay.

But...

if they hit the lotto and baby grow up to send money home to them? Home run.


16 posted on 08/18/2014 10:43:56 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Soon it will be used as a pro-abortion ad. “If you have 4 abortions, you will save a million bucks - get rich via abortions. Start turning a roll in the sack (or on the hood of a car in the Kwicky-Mart parking lot) into rolling in the dough.”


17 posted on 08/19/2014 3:26:12 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson