>>If there were a “gay gene”, shouldn’t it have died out by now?<
As an outlier aberration, like pedophilia, the numbers are so small as to be statistically insignificant and thus just part of genetic drift.
>>If there were a “gay gene”, shouldn’t it have died out by now?<
As an outlier aberration, like pedophilia, the numbers are so small as to be statistically insignificant and thus just part of genetic drift.
It’s funny how you just make things up. Which is not understanding science.
How do you explain that?