>>If there were a “gay gene”, shouldn’t it have died out by now?<
As an outlier aberration, like pedophilia, the numbers are so small as to be statistically insignificant and thus just part of genetic drift.
It’s funny how you just make things up. Which is not understanding science.
How do you explain that?
>>It’s funny how you just make things up. Which is not understanding science.
How do you explain that?<<
Do you dispute the 1.8% figure of gays in the general population recently published?
Or are you just making things up b/c I nailed you so perfectly?