To: TurboZamboni
Also...
Neomailbox.net
Unseen.is
Confidesk.com
Worthy of consideration.
2 posted on
06/21/2014 8:04:06 AM PDT by
aMorePerfectUnion
( "I didn't leave the Central Oligarchy Party. It left me." - Ronaldus Maximus)
To: TurboZamboni
3 posted on
06/21/2014 8:04:18 AM PDT by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
4 posted on
06/21/2014 8:04:55 AM PDT by
loungitude
(The truth hurts.)
To: TurboZamboni
I don’t know about CERN, but I do suspect that MIT and it’s MIT Lincoln Labs (as an FFRDC) would not jeopardize it’s long standing and lucrative position in government grants, contracts and protected budgetary status in abetting the development of an encrypted email service that the NSA could not decode. It is just not gonna happen.
5 posted on
06/21/2014 8:07:18 AM PDT by
Gaffer
To: TurboZamboni
6 posted on
06/21/2014 8:29:47 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: TurboZamboni
Privacy-respecting email services:
http://prxbx.com/email/
I use runbox.com with GPG. The only problem with GPG is that some people just can’t be bothered to even do the rather simple install process.
I like the concept that ProtonMail is using but I wouldn’t trust it fully until it had an independent security audit.
To: TurboZamboni; aMorePerfectUnion
12 posted on
06/21/2014 8:50:55 AM PDT by
null and void
(In this war, the front line is at your front door...)
To: TurboZamboni
14 posted on
06/21/2014 9:06:24 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: TurboZamboni
18 posted on
06/21/2014 11:47:13 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
("The commenters are plenty but the thinkers are few." -- Walid Shoebat)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson