Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

New England Patriots and Minnesota Vikings, among others, could be future targets.
1 posted on 06/20/2014 7:10:32 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeStatement

Blackskins, the new N-Word!


2 posted on 06/20/2014 7:12:34 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

I hear the gays are offended by Green Bay’s name....


4 posted on 06/20/2014 7:19:03 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

Blackhawk is a tribal name, is it not? Redskins is a generic name that anyone can claim is offensive. Maybe Washington should change their name to a tribal name like Mohawks. I wonder if that would pass muster?


5 posted on 06/20/2014 7:21:12 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

Don’t forget the Cowboys, Bucaneers, Raiders, Steelers, and the 49ers. Can’t have teams with names that exemplify evil groups of white people killing and exploiting native peoples and natural resources to quench their ruthless need for wealth. Oh sorry, I was in liberal mindset mode there for a minute. This is ridiculous. Political correctness has gone into overdrive. Next it will be onto names on our food. Can’t have cookies called oreos and God forbid we should have Aunt Jemima frozen waffles and Uncle Ben’s rice......


7 posted on 06/20/2014 7:24:10 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

It’s the difference between a team named the Brooklyn Chasids versus one called the Staten Island Kikes.

Redskins is not the neutral name of a tribe, or a generic group of people, it’s a derogatory term for a “savage” enemy that we tried hard to exterminate for a century.


8 posted on 06/20/2014 7:30:12 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

It’s the difference between a team named the Brooklyn Chasids versus one called the Staten Island Kikes.

Redskins is not the neutral name of a tribe, or a generic group of people, it’s a derogatory term for a “savage” enemy that we tried hard to exterminate for a century.


9 posted on 06/20/2014 7:30:12 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

The Blackhawks should worry. Liberals never stop assaulting the culture. Look what they’ve done with cigarette smoke. Look what they’ve done with gay rights. Anyone who thinks they’ll go away with a few political victories is sadly mistaken.


11 posted on 06/20/2014 7:31:43 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

How about the Los Angeles Angels MLB team? Doesn’t the name offend atheists? Wait a minute...better change the name of the city itself. Then there are those offensive ‘saint’ cities like Santa Barbara, etc. Man, this is going to get rough.


12 posted on 06/20/2014 7:32:13 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

This is not the hill I want to die on. Daniel Snyder’s licensing rights are just no concern of mine. WHO CARES. They should change their name to the Hogs in honor of the O-line of their last good teams, and be done with it. Why is this something the Republican party should be fighting for?


13 posted on 06/20/2014 7:32:59 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

How about the names of towns being offensive! There are lots of cities with Indian tribal names Just look at Oklahoma, Alabama and Mississippi.

Then there is that evil RED MAN chewing tobacco and cigar store Indians.

“Kaw-Liga”

KAW-LIGA, was a wooden Indian standing by the door
He fell in love with an Indian maid over in the antique store
KAW-LIGA - A, just stood there and never let it show
So she could never answer “YES” or “NO”.

He always wore his Sunday feathers and held a tomahawk
The maiden wore her beads and braids and hoped someday he’d talk
KAW-LIGA - A, too stubborn to ever show a sign
Because his heart was made of knotty pine.

[Chorus:]
Poor ol’ KAW-LIGA, he never got a kiss
Poor ol’ KAW-LIGA, he don’t know what he missed
Is it any wonder that his face is red
KAW-LIGA, that poor ol’ wooden head.


15 posted on 06/20/2014 7:36:25 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need more than seven rounds, Much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

Patriots were nothing but slave owners.
Vikings were the first oppressors of Native Americans


19 posted on 06/20/2014 7:41:34 AM PDT by Yorlik803 ( Church/Caboose in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

Change the name to the African American Hawks.


25 posted on 06/20/2014 7:47:24 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

I find blackskins, pinkskins, yellowskins and redskins to be in bad taste where I find blackhawks, seminoles, indians, etc. to be fine.

I think is comes from old expressions like “skin the bastard alive.”


27 posted on 06/20/2014 7:51:20 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

The Green Bay Packers are next.


32 posted on 06/20/2014 8:09:56 AM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement
I heard that the term Red Skin refers to a name given to certain Indians in the early 1700’s. They were called that because they painted their faces in red paint. Other tribes also referred to them as the Red Skins. So I guess all of the fans who color their faces at ball games are prejudice bastards.
33 posted on 06/20/2014 8:10:39 AM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

black panters?


35 posted on 06/20/2014 8:49:54 AM PDT by californian by choice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

It’s from an individual name, Chief Blackhawk. He was Fox or Sauk tribe, I believe. He was, presumably a brave man, so a good choice as a Symbol for a very masculine team sport.

Conservative blacks will not be offended by the name, but certain litigious scab pickers might be offended by the first part of Chief Blackhawk’s name.

Abraham Lincoln, who unlike the current occupant of the White House, served in Military, fought in the Blackhawk wars. He stopped overnight at a spring near Whitewater Wisconsin and his horse was stolen. He had to walk all the way back to Salem Illinois.


39 posted on 06/20/2014 7:41:48 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

The African-American Hawks would be more a more sensitive name.


40 posted on 06/20/2014 7:46:14 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeStatement

42 posted on 06/22/2014 11:52:30 AM PDT by Impala64ssa (You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson