Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

. . . but they aren’t counting from 2009 to the present, I see. Or from 1992 to 2000.
1 posted on 06/16/2014 1:38:52 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

There will be FReepers along soon to tell us that U. S. manufacturing is producing more goods (dollar value) than before.


2 posted on 06/16/2014 2:48:33 AM PDT by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Yes, it’s called framing the argument. However, the most egregious example is the primary premise of the article (and title) to begin with.

The objective is to get that phrase “Income Gap” out there and blame it on someone. In reading the article, the problem of excessive government regulation, oppressive taxes, demonization and external influence on business decisions are not even discussed. It’s almost as if “income gap” begets “factory shutdown and relocation”.

Whatever business’ decisions are for shutdown and/or relocation, nothing is mentioned about liberal interference in wages, unions, government taxes, oppressive government regulations, and NOTHING is mentioned about the new goldmine of the ‘entitled’ American worker - EITC, TANF, WICs, SECTION 8, SNAP and all the rest - it takes a SUBSTANTIAL wage/salary structure to compete with the disposable income of this “new American worker.”


3 posted on 06/16/2014 3:34:00 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Did anyone note that they lost their manufacturing jobs after she bought a Mazda 3?


6 posted on 06/16/2014 3:55:04 AM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Amazing, isn’t it?

That the “income gap” widens under the policies of those who are worried about it,

and narrows under the policies of those who know it’s not really an issue?


17 posted on 06/16/2014 6:43:23 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Globalization, regulations taxes debt EPA automation and recession destroyed nearly 6 million manufacturing jobs.

LAT again omits the rest of the story another case of covering Obama&Co a$$.


19 posted on 06/16/2014 6:46:35 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Obama Bagged $18 Million In Corporate, Special Interest Cash For Second Inauguration

Obama’s big money corporate donors included:

AT&T—$4.6 million Microsoft—$2.1 million Boeing—$1 million Chevron—$1 million Genentech—$750,000 Deloitte—$500,000 FedEx—$500,000 Coca Cola—$430,000 Bank of America—$300,000 Xerox—$250,000 ExxonMobil—$250,000 Northrup Grumman—$100,000 Verizon—$100,000

Obama also hauled in $250,000 checks from each of the following unions: The International Association of Fire Fighters, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, and the National Education Association.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/23/Obama-Bagged-18-Million-In-Corporate-Special-Interest-Cash-For-Second-Inauguration

party of the ‘workin’ man’ and the ‘little guy’, yep, un-huh.

Wall Street Responsible For One-Third Of Obama’s Campaign Funds (from July 22, 2011)

One-third of the Obama re-election campaign’s record-breaking second-quarter fundraising came from sources associated with the financial sector, the Washington Post reports.

That percentage is up from the 20% of donations that came from Wall Street donors in 2008, and contradicts reports that a growing Wall Street animosity towards the Obama administration may jeopardize his re-election bid.

Obama’s $86 million haul set a record for incumbent fundraising at this point in an election campaign. While the campaign has downplayed the larger donations by emphasizing that the average donation was $69, it also released a list of contributions by “bundlers;” those who can “bundle” more than $50,000 in contributions from friends, relatives and business associates.

(Excerpt)

http://www.businessinsider.com/wall-street-responsible-for-one-third-of-obamas-campaign-funds-2011-7


21 posted on 06/26/2014 6:41:45 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson