[ClearCase_guy]

Anarchism has taken many forms over the years. There have been Christian Anarchists (Tolstoy), Anarcho-Capitalists (Austrian School), Mutualist Anarchists (Proudhon), Anarcho-Communists (Kropotkin) and many varieties of Socialist Anarchists, who disliked coercive government, but did hope for redistribution of wealth within society.

As far as I can determine, modern Anarchists are not anarchists at all -- they are people violently pushing the ideas of Karl Marx, attempting to implement of coercive system of one world government and centralized control of the means of production within the global economy.

Communists, pure and simple.

[Caipirabob]

I can't agree with that assessment. A true anarchy is the total and complete absence of government. Absolute freedom.

These are simply socialist terrorists.

The media mislabels them to server the purpose of tarnishing the right.

We cannot let them control the language and we defeat them every time we point it out.

Don't get me wrong, we don't want anarchy because we believe in a Constitutional Republic of Laws. It's just that the description of what is taking place here is completely inaccurate.

These are socialist/communist terrorists resorting to violence like their NAZI forefathers.

[MtnClimber]

The police could react to attacks in a way that the attackers won’t be able to ever do it again.

[JimSEA]

Bolsheviks and Red Guard if you will.

[Zionist Conspirator]

As far as I can determine, modern Anarchists are not anarchists at all -- they are people violently pushing the ideas of Karl Marx, attempting to implement of coercive system of one world government and centralized control of the means of production within the global economy.

Communists, pure and simple.

This is also what I believe. You never hear anything about abolition of the State from these "anarchists."

Of course, classical anarchism opposes the State secondarily. Its primary opposition is to private property, and regards the State as the creation of private property and the lesser evil. For this reason (as another FReeper has pointed out) anarchists have always been happy to cooperate with totalitarian Marxists because private property is enemy number one to them. Then after the revolution they get lined against the wall by their allies and shot. But they never seem to learn.

[RayChuang88]

I wonder do those people realize what Communism did to too many countries during the 20th Century? Ask the elderly survivors of the former Soviet Union under Stalin between 1928 and 1953 and China under Mao between 1949 and 1976 what that was like with mass shootings, labor camps, forced exile, deliberate famine and misguided economic policies, for starters.

Today, between China and the Soviet Union, the death toll--depending on scholarly estimate--ranges from 90 to 150 million dead from the effects of Communism. And look at how Communism decimated what could have been the most prosperous country in Latin America in Cuba.