Posted on 04/28/2014 8:26:53 PM PDT by DBCJR
Greta Van Susteren has been a journalist for CNN and Fox News channels since the 1990s. She has a reputation for being objective, and reporting only on stories that she finds to be truthful. She has been known to vet sources and facts herself.
When she reported on the 9/11 Benghazi scandal, she chronicled the Obama administrations attempts to portray the attack as a conspiracy created by an American filmmakers anti-Islamic short film. As soon as it became clear that the incident was a terrorist attack, the administration started to withhold their information.
Now Susteren is claiming that the Obama administration failed to invite Fox News to the State Department conference bridge, even as they alerted other news agencies. Fox News has also been repeatedly dodged in their mission to expose the Benghazi cover up.
Susteren claims that someone at the Obama administration has also made clear threats to members of her staff, telling them that they would have their careers ended if they continued to investigate the Benghazi incident.
Name names, Greta; give them Hell.
Pollyanna is getting very tiresome.
They wouldn't have anything to hide now would they?
F U B O!
I sincerely doubt if Greta will back down.
RICO, RICO, RICO.
If true, expose them, and watch your ratings go up, otherwise put a cork in it, been there done that with all the others.
Greta is one of the few true “journalists” who are willing to investigate and report without bias or spin. She and Sharyl Atkinson would make a hell of a team, and I hope Roger Ailes is listening ;-)
Her only “sin” is failing to obey the White House directives to the media that all the rest kowtow to. Go Greta!
FUBO!! Come and take it!!
Maybe drive another van will get them an invite?
!
BTTT!
The reason for this is that Stevens was on a rare trip to Benghazi at the insistence of Hillary with 31 CIA weapons experts and only two independent body guards to buy back MAN PAD missiles from the AL Qaeda that she supported to be given them because the French would not authorize a “no fly zone” over Libya. After she helped the Al Qaeda murder Qaddafi, she panicked. What about the “stinger missiles that can now shoot down huge civilian aircraft? So the idea was to buy them back. The Al Qaeda set the price at somewhere north of $500 million in gold and the exchange was to be on their favorite holiday. 9/11!! . Someone please ask her why her Ambassador was there? The BS is that they wanted to elevate the consulate to a “Diplomatic Station” ON 9/11???? Where is the proof of that? Why the hell were 31 CIA weapons experts there?? Why the hell are they intimidated into not talking? Why the hell did Steven fly there with two seals in a C130? Why not a chopper. Wake the hell up. I think she is a traitor!!
Iirc she and her lawyer husband were both Clinton supporters at one time. Her involvment with Franklin Graham and the Palins seem to have changed that attitude. They are all involved and bonded thru Samaritan s Purse.
“If true, expose them, and watch your ratings go up, otherwise put a cork in it, been there done that with all the others.”
I second that.
“Susteren claims that someone at the Obama administration has also made clear threats to members of her staff, telling them that they would have their careers ended if they continued to investigate the Benghazi incident.”
Believeable! VERY believeable.
I heard her say that her husband was an atty for Hillary’s campaign. Next thing, I heard was that he went to work for McCain’s campaign, she met Sarah and it seemed her whole attitude changed.
Democrats operate under a pack mentality. They are like rabid Coyotes. They bullishly push their way forward, mouths foaming thinking the animal to the left has their back. They never learn when they splatter against reality.
Questions about their faith seemed also to vanish.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.